nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Benefit fraud

unclebob

Clamping down on fraud

https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/dwp-benefit-claimants-whose-bank-32173288

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

poppy123456

This isn't new in the news and there's been many different threads on here regarding this. No one knows exactly what will happen yet because no further details have been provided.

Hannah_Alumni

@unclebob Thank you for sharing the article.

I understand that there is a very small percentage of people who claim fraudulently, but the amount of man hours paid that will go into this vs those hours going into reviewing claims quicker is what frustrates me.

unclebob

Hannah_Scope said:

@unclebob Thank you for sharing the article.

I understand that there is a very small percentage of people who claim fraudulently, but the amount of man hours paid that will go into this vs those hours going into reviewing claims quicker is what frustrates me.

Yes will cost them more in the end. Only thing i worry about is the money i have in my business account.

Hannah_Alumni

@unclebob Hopefully if the changes do happen, all information and questions like the one you have asked are answered!

unclebob

woodbine said:

Discussed on here adnasium

Might not be good changes

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering