nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Question on criteria

Rumbler303

Hello,

I'm aware that "reliably" means:

S - Safely

T - Timely

A - Acceptable

R - Reasonable

If you have any of the points that you fit into on a category, if you can't do a task based on only one of these above, is that how you earn the points?

Thanks.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Albus_Alumni

Hey @Rumbler303 basically right. It's if you can do something 51% of the time.

For example;
If I can walk 50 meters - No points.
If I can walk 50 meters, but I keep falling - points awarded.
If I can walk 50 meters, but then cannot do it again for 4 days due to pain - points awarded.

I hope that makes sense?

Rumbler303

https://forum.scope.org.uk/discussion/comment/1008438#Comment_1008438

Makes sense, so it's basically if you fail any of the STAR individual bits and cannot do something for majority of the time (51% or more) then you'll qualify?

Albus_Alumni

I'd not say you'll qualify, but in theory, you would qualify. The assessors often think otherwise, but those are the guidelines that they should be marking you by. It's all about what you cant do for the majority of the time.

Rumbler303

In theory I would, but practically I might not? Is what you're essentially saying is that it's completely down to the assessor and your own individual circumstances?

Albus_Alumni

It's down to the decision maker to decide, but if they deny you the points, then it'll usually be overturned in a tribunal.

I was awarded 0 points by assessors, twice. But once I went to the tribunal, I was awarded enhanced rate for both components without any extra evidence.

Rumbler303

That's interesting, thank you.

WhatThe

It's all down to DWP, never the health assessor.

Rumbler303

https://forum.scope.org.uk/discussion/comment/1008438#Comment_1008438

I think I may have got the STAR acronym wrong, is it:

S - Safely

T - Timely

A - Acceptable

R - Repeatedly (not Reasonable) - meaning you can do, for example, something in the morning, but not in the afternoon?

Thanks.

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering