Rachel Reeves budget for disabled
After a high court judge making money saving cuts for disabled illegal..How is Reeves still seemingly going forward with Disability cuts ?
Comments
-
Generally speaking court rulings havent prevented governments from doing what they want to do, especially when is a lack of mainstream media attention and lack of public knowledge of said rulings.
Also as I understand it the court didnt rule the cuts illegal, but rather the way that the consultation was carried out, the DWP didnt do it properly. This was also related to the WCA consultation specifically, not the PIP one.
More details here.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Clifford-v-SSWP-Judgment-16-January-2025.pdf1 -
As @worried33 mentions, what was ruled illegal was the way a consultation was carried out. As there are specific legal guidelines the government must stick to when carrying out a consultation.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.9K Start here and say hello!
- 7.6K Coffee lounge
- 108 Games den
- 1.8K People power
- 165 Announcements and information
- 25.4K Talk about life
- 6.2K Everyday life
- 508 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 875 Education and skills
- 2K Work
- 588 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.2K Transport and travel
- 647 Relationships
- 1.6K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 882 Rare, invisible, & undiagnosed conditions
- 942 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.3K Autism and neurodiversity
- 41K Talk about your benefits
- 6.1K Employment & Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20.3K PIP, DLA, ADP & AA
- 9.2K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.3K Benefits and income
