Rachel Reeves budget for disabled

After a high court judge making money saving cuts for disabled illegal..How is Reeves still seemingly going forward with Disability cuts ?
Comments
-
Generally speaking court rulings havent prevented governments from doing what they want to do, especially when is a lack of mainstream media attention and lack of public knowledge of said rulings.
Also as I understand it the court didnt rule the cuts illegal, but rather the way that the consultation was carried out, the DWP didnt do it properly. This was also related to the WCA consultation specifically, not the PIP one.
More details here.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Clifford-v-SSWP-Judgment-16-January-2025.pdf1 -
As @worried33 mentions, what was ruled illegal was the way a consultation was carried out. As there are specific legal guidelines the government must stick to when carrying out a consultation.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15K Start here and say hello!
- 7.1K Coffee lounge
- 83 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 110 Announcements and information
- 23.8K Talk about life
- 5.6K Everyday life
- 334 Current affairs
- 2.4K Families and carers
- 860 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 510 Money and bills
- 3.6K Housing and independent living
- 1K Transport and travel
- 873 Relationships
- 254 Sex and intimacy
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 859 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 918 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.1K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 38.7K Talk about your benefits
- 5.9K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.4K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.5K Benefits and income