We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
nicw3 said: I am just trying to get a quick simple yes or no answer to a question without having to pay expensive legal fees, can anyone help please?I recently took school to first tier tribunal special educational needs and disability court. The court have ruled that school did discriminate against my Autistic son and breached the Equality Act 2010. What I want to know now is can I take this further and try to claim compensation from school as they were in the wrong and I guess you can probably imagine the negative long term impact this has had on him and us as a family? Does anyone know can I take it further?Thanks
hiya sorry to trouble you, but I was wondering if you don't mind telling me, did the school have a barrister at the sen tribunal to act for them
nicw3 said: No they brought in their legal team from within the Academy chain! We had to it where we didn't attend court because of lockdown. At the begin of April we had a conference call between a judge, myself and school. Then we were asked to confirm the argument and their defence and then it was dealt with in by court because of lockdown we couldn't attend.
hells123 said: nicw3 said: No they brought in their legal team from within the Academy chain! We had to it where we didn't attend court because of lockdown. At the begin of April we had a conference call between a judge, myself and school. Then we were asked to confirm the argument and their defence and then it was dealt with in by court because of lockdown we couldn't attend. yes im in a similar position, my case is going before the sen tribunal in wales on Tuesday, my boy has been bullied by two kids in relation to his disability and the school have not recorded the incidents and not dealt with it, and investigated it, but have dealt with similar incidents involving the same two children and those other children who reported it without disabilities received apologies and my son hasn't. I only got their paperwork last week and was surprised to find they have hired some hot shot barrister from Cardiff to represent them, they have denied any wrongdoing, and I wonder why the need to hire a barrister if they have done nothing wrong, has kind of put me on the back foot a little bit, I am not legally trained by no means, but going up against a person like that is of some concern. How did it affect you if you don't mind me asking. All I want from this is for all children to be treated equally and the decision making afforded to all children the same.
nicw3 said: It is frightening and quite horrendous to be honest. It made me quite ill and the negative impact this has had on my son and his siblings is simply not acceptable or fair!! I did this because I felt so strongly that schools should not be allowed to continue to get away with it. The blatant disregard they had for us just pushed me to breaking point and that made me continue the fight. School have been ordered to review and update policies and have been told to apologise to my son. I don't know who will enforce this? I also feel they should loose their Ofsted excellent status with immediate effect. Schools, especially academies need to realise they are accountable and can not continue to think their can do whatever they like to fit their business plans! Good luck for Tuesday I hope you get the result you want. And just so you know I have no legal knowledge I'm just a frustrated parent of children with SEND and I'm sick of the failings of schools.
If the remedies that they have been asked to undertake are not done, report it back to the tribunal, ask for the review and the updated policies and the evidence of your son's apology. I would report the matter to ofsted so that the next time they carry out their assessment they are aware of it, ofsted may be similar to estyn in that they do not deal with individual complaints, but you should make them aware. estyn are aware of the issues that I have but mine in relation to my daughter are safeguarding issues.
yes im in that position too, the situation with my daughter was far worse of over a longer period of time that did cause me to be ill and stressed, that I am only just recovering from, so when things started to happen with my older child I thought oh here we go again, the difference with him is the welsh government brought in new statutory guidance to deal with bullying that was not in force when my daughter was suffering,
Estyn regulate our schools and they had a excellent rating saying children felt confident with the bullying policies, and that the school robustly deal with bullying, load of nonsense. in the first few weeks, there was 5 physical fights that my son witnessed against other children and have not been recorded correctly and the police have not been informed as they should be within these new guidelines. they are expected to record all incidents of bullying, and have to indentify a good reason to depart from their expectations, the reason they have given is that they did not record the incidents is that because corey did not report the incidents he came home and told me, the guidance does not allow or specify schools can only record incidents of bullying when only learners report it. Be interested to hear their response and defence for them not recording all the incidents as reported to them, especially given that I have conversations that verify the other two mums also reported the incidents on behalf of their children and not the children themselves and received apologies.
For the tribunal to have decided that the school had descrimnated against your son, must of meant there were flaws or errors in their defence, did the tribunal advise you what these were. How long did the conversation last for
newborn said: The Equalities law means Disablism is illegal, like Racism. But nobody enforces the law on Ageism or Disablism. My infallible test is, if you set out the same situation, but made it an issue of Racism, would the response be a horrified rush to drastically correct the system, retrain staff, apologise, and management in fear of getting sacked with loss of pension and no union to back them up because what they did was unlawful and reprehensible?
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering