Not been awarded PIP. Mandatory Reconsideration, is it worth it? Please help

John_Moody

It all comes down the what evidence you can provide, they ignore pretty much everything the claimant says and rely completely on medical evidence from professionals even if those professionals are as thick as two short planks (which they usually are).

The guys at the tribunals go to the same lodge as the people who run the DWP, they spend their time getting drunk and smacking each others bottoms with paddles.

And now you know why the country is in a mess, get your evidence but it won't be easy, be a Pitbull and latch on to their buttocks until you get what you want.

poppy123456

Medical evidence is only useful if it states exactly how your conditions affect you and most doesn't. As has been advised in this thread many times, your anecdotal evidence.. real world incidents is what's needed.

andwhatisnow

poppy123456 said:

No one has mentioned anything about accidents. I think the advice about just requesting the MR is the best thing to do at this stage. The most likely outcome will be the decision will remain the same, though we have had some members who've had the MR decision changed in their favour.

If it doesn't change then you can proceed to Tribunal and get some expert advice, if you can get representation then even better.

I meant incidents.
The fact that the MR decision will likely remain the same really hurts me, considering all the thinking/writing that I'm doing.
Yesterday I was called by a local law charity and maybe someone will be assigned to my case. Hopefully with an expert the outcome will change.

calcotti

andwhatisnow said:.. The fact that the MR decision will likely remain the same really hurts me, considering all the thinking/writing that I'm doing.

Decisions do get changed at MR stage even though the majority do not. Even if the decision is unchanged at MR the effort you are making now will help at appeal stage.

andwhatisnow

Someone from a law charity called me today. I'm not sure I received the right advices, as this person told me to do the MR on the phone (you all said writing is better) and explain why I disagree with their decision, and to collect medical evidence from doctors, when you all said it's not necessary.
I wanted someone to look at my explanations and maybe rewrite them in a way that they will work.
Can anyone here help me privately?

poppy123456

I always advise to put the MR in writing, rather than phone. 

Medical evidence isn’t really needed and is only useful if it states exactly how your conditions affect you. 

I personally don’t advise privately here because I just don’t have the time to do that. I also don’t know exactly how your conditions affect you and to advise anyone like this I would need to know everything about your conditions, which isn’t possible on any Internet forum. 

There’s no right or wrong wording that you should use, just tell it how it is. 

calcotti

If you do it in writing and keep a copy you have a record of what you have said. If you do it by phone you have no record and you are reliant on what the best person taking the call writes down. I think it’s fairly obvious which is better for you.

poppy123456 said:

I personally don’t advise privately here because I just don’t have the time to do that. 

Ditto.

andwhatisnow

Sorry for the many repetitions but...
If I say....Leaving my room and going to the kitchen, makes my anxiety go out of control, fearful thoughts invade my brain. Due to the fact that my brain is already occupied by traumatic thoughts, if I try to concentrate on another task, my anxiety goes up even more, and I can't handle it, so I have to leave immediately.

Also, I told the lady on the phone that when I'm able to go to the kitchen, I use ready steamed meals from supermarkets through the microwave. That alone is already 2 points. I don't know why she put 0.

chili14

andwhatisnow said:

Sorry for the many repetitions but...
If I say....Leaving my room and going to the kitchen, makes my anxiety go out of control, fearful thoughts invade my brain. Due to the fact that my brain is already occupied by traumatic thoughts, if I try to concentrate on another task, my anxiety goes up even more, and I can't handle it, so I have to leave immediately.

Also, I told the lady on the phone that when I'm able to go to the kitchen, I use ready steamed meals from supermarkets through the microwave. That alone is already 2 points. I don't know why she put 0.

I maybe wrong here and a more experienced member might be better placed for advice but (if I remember correctly & I probably don’t!) using a microwave to heat a tin of soup is acceptable method of preparing food. So I’d assume a microwave meal would be same criteria?
I don’t think how often you eat would be a factor either. When you can do it can you do it well? In this instance, though your not eating as often as you should by your own admission, the answer is yes.
I could be completely wrong on this - I’ve filled in the form once and was declined, so am no means an expert!


also, I’m sorry your having a tough time with your mental health. You’ve alluded to previous trauma, I hope your getting help with that. There are some good talking therapy’s available if you can’t handle leaving the house to see someone. 

calcotti

chili14 said:..I maybe wrong here and a more experienced member might be better placed for advice but (if I remember correctly & I probably don’t!) using a microwave to heat a tin of soup is acceptable method of preparing food. So I’d assume a microwave meal would be same criteria?

Using a microwave to heat food is considered as being able to heat food, however the activity includes being able to prepare food which means being able to take raw ingredients and peel and chop them as necessary.