'Thanks to Universal Credit, I can’t live with my girlfriend without losing financial independence' — Scope | Disability forum
Please read our updated community house rules and community guidelines.

'Thanks to Universal Credit, I can’t live with my girlfriend without losing financial independence'

Options
Tori_Scope
Tori_Scope Scope Posts: 12,496 Disability Gamechanger

In an article in the Metro Shona, a Scope storyteller, explains how Universal Credit rules mean she can't move in with her partner without losing her income and financial independence.

When my girlfriend and I first started talking about moving in together, I didn’t fully realise the financial impact it would have on me.

Excited conversations about how nice it would be to have our own little space, and to not have to travel so far to see each other, quickly turned into frantic googling after I discovered through others sharing their experiences that cohabiting meant I could lose some of my benefits.

People always talk about the money you can save by living with someone else but I could actually be worse off if we moved in together. Much worse off. 
Why? I’m reliant on Universal Credit for a big portion of my income, because I am disabled. And if I was to move in with my partner, I could lose at least half of the benefits that I’m currently entitled to. 

I live with a genetic condition called Marfan Syndrome, which means I use an electric wheelchair to get around and, just a few months ago, I had major open-heart surgery due to my condition. The way my disability affects me changes on a daily basis; I deal with chronic pain and fatigue every day but some days are worse than others. A severe migraine or a flare up of my spinal pain can wipe out a whole day for me.

As a result, working full-time hours just isn’t possible so I am reliant on
Universal Credit.

In the UK, the benefit is means-tested against not only your own income and savings, but also those of your partner, if you choose to move in together and be legally recognised as a couple.

This means that my girlfriend – fortunately, or unfortunately – earns too much for me to be entitled to any support if we lived together. If my Universal Credit was cut, I would be almost completely reliant on her for money, and that’s not a situation either of us desires. 

The amount of money I receive through Universal Credit already varies depending on my self-employed income each month – but, on average, I’d be going from getting £400-£600 a month, to far less.  

I became officially self-employed three years ago, after realising that working for myself is the only type of employment that is flexible enough and accessible for me. I now work as a freelance writer and photographer, and I run a small Etsy shop selling crochet animals and bee keyrings. 

However, despite the accessibility, the income can be very unstable. It is never guaranteed, and it can vary dramatically from month to month. My disability affects how much I can work – one day I might only manage to reply to a few emails, but the next I could feel well enough to take an in-person photography job. This means I never quite know how much I’ll make each month.

In a good month, I could earn nearly as much as my partner, meaning the amount of Universal Credit I receive goes down. The next month I might only be able to take on one or two jobs and suddenly I’m back to being fully reliant on my benefits.

It’s the unpredictable nature of my work and my disability combined that makes it such a risk to lose the security that Universal Credit provides. 

It doesn’t seem in any way fair that I am forced to choose between being dependent on a partner and living with them, or being self-sufficient but living separately.

I met my girlfriend almost three years ago, through our shared love of theatre – she spotted me at the stage door of one of our favourite shows, Bat Out Of Hell the Musical. And, thanks to social media, we connected a few weeks later. I have a very visible disability so from the start she was aware of some of the barriers that might be in our way, but we were determined to face them together.

As things progressed, moving in together was a conversation that naturally came up. It felt like a really obvious step for us, particularly as we live over an hour away from each other. We’re currently stuck only being able to see each other once a week – all of which makes it even more frustrating that we can’t move in together without me losing a huge chunk of my income.

I feel a lot of guilt as a disabled person – I often feel like an inconvenience, and someone that makes life more difficult. I think about how straightforward moving out would be if I was able to work full time hours, and if my disability didn’t limit my options. My partner is incredible at reassuring me, but she is definitely angry at the benefits system for putting us in this position.  

Moving in with the person you love is meant to be a happy and exciting step to take together but, for couples like us, anxiety is the overriding emotion. I feel like I’m stalling our relationship and it’s hard not to blame yourself in this situation, even though there is no one to blame but the government.

It truly feels like the odds are stacked against me. It feels like I don’t have, and won’t ever have, the same chance at independence that my peers have.
It’s likely that I won’t ever be able to work a traditional nine-to-five job. Having my own financial security and independence, while also living with my girlfriend, often feels like a pipe dream.

There are wider repercussions as well. Given that disabled people are almost three times as likely to experience domestic abuse, it’s shocking that our own benefits system can work to take away our independence, rather than give us it.

Countless disabled people who cannot work long term are forced to rely on their partners financially, meaning that they may feel stuck in less-than-ideal circumstances.  

Even for those couples where both members are reliant on Universal Credit, it’s only paid into one bank account, if living together. I feel very grateful to be in a safe and loving relationship because I can see just how easy it would be to find yourself trapped within an abusive one, in a situation like this.

For now, I’ll keep doing my best to try and make our dream a reality.

Unfortunately, there is really only one way to make it happen: I will have to work beyond what I’m physically capable of to make sure I have my own financial independence, and make up the gap that losing Universal Credit would create.

We’ve faced so many hurdles together already, I’m determined that this will be another we will conquer somehow. I know it will happen eventually for us, but for many others, the outcome will not be a positive one.

It’s time our government recognised the importance of financial independence and updated the benefits system accordingly, so couples like us aren’t having to choose between a rock and a hard place.

A DWP spokesperson told Metro.co.uk: ‘Universal Credit is designed to help with day-to-day living costs, so it is right that household income is taken into account when claims are made. We also offer non-means tested support such as Personal Independence Payments to help people with the extra costs of living with a disability or health condition.’

Do you think it's fair that a partner's income and savings are taken into account if two people live together? 

Do you think disabled people are punished for wanting to live with their partner? 

Could the DWP do anything to ensure disabled people can remain financially independent if they choose to live with their partner? 

Tell us your thoughts in the comments!

National Campaigns Officer, she/her

Check out our Playground Accessibility Map

Comments

  • woodbine
    woodbine Community member Posts: 11,755 Disability Gamechanger
    Options
    Do I think it's fair..yes I do, and it's always been this way.

    I don't think disabled people are being punished.

    Most disabled people claim PIP and that would continue to be paid to the disabled claimant.


    2024 The year of the general election...the time for change is coming 💡

  • Cress
    Cress Community member Posts: 1,012 Pioneering
    edited October 2021
    Options

    Sad but lots of things aren't fair....maybe in this particular situation a compromise would be possible ie to spend half the week at each others house, then would there be no effect on benefits? At least they'll get to spend a lot more time together...and if they did move in together there would be savings with rent, bills which would go some way to mitigate the loss of benefits...

    Sorry, not thinking this is a particularly difficult problem to have.
  • calcotti
    calcotti Community member Posts: 10,010 Disability Gamechanger
    Options
    On means tested benefits a couple have always got less than two individuals and only one member of the couple would be paid the means tested benefit. Universal Credit is actually better than legacy benefits for a couple because both UC claimants get NI credits (albeit only Class 3) whereas on legacy benefits only the claimant (and not the partner) got NI credits.
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • chiarieds
    chiarieds Community member Posts: 16,127 Disability Gamechanger
    Options
    Putting aside Universal Credit, moving in together, or being married, can mean there are financial inequalities anyway. I think we may all like to feel financially independent, but speaking personally, this can change. After I got married, my husband felt awkward as I earned more than him; once we started our family that changed as he was the only person bringing in a wage. So, at different stages of our lives there may be such financial inequalities anyway.
    I do appreciate Shona's comments about her disability, as I have a heritable connective tissue disorder too, & was also for a long time self employed. In her case, however, it does appear as a couple they would have sufficient monies even if Shona's UC will be reduced, so I don't see that as unfair, nor discriminating of anyone with a disability. I don't see Shona & her girlfriend being forced into making a decision whether to live together or not despite their differing incomes....it's a choice.
    I do wish them both well.
  • woodbine
    woodbine Community member Posts: 11,755 Disability Gamechanger
    Options
    We have always had a joint bank account which we saw as the perfectly right thing to do all those years ago, but over the years we have known many couples who have has separate bank accounts.
    2024 The year of the general election...the time for change is coming 💡

  • Upgirl
    Upgirl Community member Posts: 1 Listener
    Options
    I'm stunned that most commenters think this is fair - not least because we don't know the income level of the partner. If they are on 100k a year, it may well be fair, but what if they are earning average money? It is well observed today that you need two incomes to run a decent home, but this is beside the point. If you are not married and you are not in a civil partnership, then you have not made that committment and you should not be expected to cover someone elses living costs.

    There is no law in the land that can force someone to support the operson they live with financially if they are not married or in a civil partnership, yet this noxious law exists that would allow the benefit claimant to stripped of their income - whether or not the partner is willing or able to support.

    I'm on the other side of this. I would like to move in with my boyfriend but he is on long term disability benefits. I would happily pay for him, but I earn an average wage and with the cost of renting, food, fuel and bills, I don't earn enough to pay someone elses rent and living costs on top, as well as pay for my own pension plan and future security etc- yet, I earn enough for the government to strip him of his benefits if we lived together because the benchmark for earning is set stupidly low.

    Even if I could just about scrape the money together to pay for him, it would mean I am working, in a reasonably paid job, full time hours, but languishing on the same level of poverty as someone on benefits  - this is not a deal any self-respecting working person will accept I'm afraid. 

    No this is a rotten, unfair law, affecting many people and not only opens up huge opportunities for disabled peaple to be abused and exploited by unscruplous partners, it makes many working people actively avoid a relationship with a disabled person on benefits.
  • 66Mustang
    66Mustang Community member Posts: 13,894 Disability Gamechanger
    edited April 30
    Options
    I appreciate this is an old revived thread and I respect the views of others but I too think it is unfair, so you are not entirely alone @Upgirl

    I can understand giving a smaller monthly wage for both people, because of course lots of bills are shared so there will be a saving there

    However I don't agree with the fact that if one member in the couple works, the other member is expected to live off of that person's wage - my brother earns just over minimum wage and he can barely sustain himself, let alone if his partner stopped working - it simply wouldn't be enough money!!

    The other thing I find unfair is that, unless I am mistaken - which I may be, the limits on capital are the same? If a single person has untold riches amounting £16,000 that is seen as enough to retire and live happily ever after so their benefits stop. Aside from the fact that £16,000 is not a huge amount these days so needs to be raised anyway, why does a couple not at least have a slightly higher limit?

Brightness

Do you need advice on your energy costs?


Scope’s Disability Energy Support service is open to any disabled household in England or Wales in which one or more disabled people live. You can get free advice from an expert adviser on managing energy debt, switching tariffs, contacting your supplier and more. Find out more information by visiting our
Disability Energy Support webpage.