Trial by jury
Lammy announced wants to scrap trial by jury for less serious crimes?? Please tell me they cant just do this ??? Ive emailed my mp on this and digital ID and im getting no case number back or confirmation is anyone else experiencing this
Comments
-
My cousin was a QC before he retired, he was once the prosecution barrister for a man that stole half a pound of butter... that trial (by jury) at a crown court lasted about 4 days, at a cost of thousands of pounds.
The accused was found not guilty.... All that time and money on a nonsensical offences, but because he pleaded not guilty it resulted in a very costly trial.
And you think Lammy is wrong.
2 -
I testified in a serious assault case at the Sheriff Court, which was thrown out for lack of evidence ( I was the only witness who didn't balk at threats if I testified). A jury would have added yet more expense to the proceedings.
1 -
Exactly @Chris75_ people don't realise the cost of some of the trials.
2 -
I thought it was a bad thing as people saying its a step towards state run judges ? And they can do as they pls
0 -
Talking about waste of money, did you see a judge in the US has thrown out that farcical case against James Comey?
1 -
0
-
I wouldn't believe everything you read, most of it is click bait, and what even is a state run judge...we don't have states that'll be the good old USA.
2 -
I've never understood American law @Chris75_ it baffles me. I'm just glad we have a decent judicial system.
1 -
Sort of mixed on this
It could be a lottery of what judge a defendant is given. How much money the CPS have wasted is more the point. Or how dis-honest the arresting officer is in some cases
The best example I can give is my own son
Travelled from Liverpool to Cardiff to watch Wales play football, got lost on the way back to the hotel by himself, stopped 3 men to ask directions … one of whom started to attack him
Ended up with my son knocking him out. Subsequently charged with GBH.
The initial presiding judge wouldn't let the "victim's" convictions be made public, or all the CCTV be played
Cut to the day of the trial … a new judge, allowed the defending barrister to question the victim … turns out he likes putting his grandmother in hospital
CCTV showed my son defending himself after being attacked, also the broken nose and fractured cheek the victim sustained didn't come from my son, but an earlier altercation the victim had
The judge just laughed and asked the Prosecution if they were embarrassed … then instructed the jury to bring a case of not guilty as it was in her eyes a malicious prosecution of someone acting in self defence. She awarded my son hundreds in travel and hotel costs, also instructed his barrister to open a civil case because the CPS tried to with hold evidence.
My point - it can't be down to luck on the day
As for the arresting officer … he stayed behind to shake my son's hand and to say he's glad he took it all the way because he didn't want to prosecute
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.6K Start here and say hello!
- 7.4K Coffee lounge
- 103 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 149 Announcements and information
- 24.6K Talk about life
- 6K Everyday life
- 462 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 886 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 553 Money and bills
- 3.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.1K Transport and travel
- 630 Relationships
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.5K Talk about your impairment
- 873 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 934 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.1K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 40.8K Talk about your benefits
- 6.1K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 8.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.8K Benefits and income
