"Sickness handouts to be cut for mentally ill" under Labour proposal- The Telegraph

JonnycJonny
JonnycJonny Scope Member Posts: 253 Empowering

The Telegraph are reporting that those with 'mild' mental health conditions 'could' see their benefits reduced. I cannot vouch for this article but it continues the Tory narrative.

Best wishes to all

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/10/11/mental-health-benefits-budget-2024-liz-kendall-reeves/

«1345

Comments

  • Charlie5
    Charlie5 Online Community Member Posts: 152 Contributor

    If labour did take away Lcwra could they do it straight away or would it have to pass some sort of bill? All this about mild mental health spin will only get people more anxious and more depressed.And how would they class mild mental health? It's not a one size fits all when it comes to mental health.

  • JonnycJonny
    JonnycJonny Scope Member Posts: 253 Empowering
    edited October 2024

    I don't believe it could happen from one day to the next - in other words immediately post Budget. Any such change would have to be tied in with the proposed changes to the WCA which again have not yet been fully debated in Parliament - but it would seem there is broad cross party support for the WCA to be tweaked and made more stringent. I do not pretend to understand the ins and outs of public finance but I have read somewhere that the Treasury has already factored in a reduction of welfare benefits over the course of the next five years or so - a change is definitely coming.

    Your point about 'mild' is true - again, a move back to a formally 'diagnosed' ill health condition - be it physical or mental - is the direction of travel I feel - along the lines of DLA. It will no longer be enough just to say how you 'feel' and 'cope' with daily life - it would need to be confirmed by a clinical professional in order to access certain benefit rates like LCWRA.

    It's all up in the air still until Budget day and the release of the Get Britain Working White Paper.

    Best wishes

  • Charlie5
    Charlie5 Online Community Member Posts: 152 Contributor

    Thankyou for your informative message.Its a worrying time for alot of people.

    I am currently under a mental health nurse for my depression and anxiety.

    Also on the waiting list for autism assessment. Take medication also.

    Would this class me in the bracket of being confirmed by a clinical professional.

    Many thanks

  • Zipz
    Zipz Online Community Member Posts: 4,351 Championing

    I agree @Nightcity "handouts" is a vile phrase. I also think the government has been stunned by the reaction to the Winter Fuel issue and is backtracking- any even thinking much harder- about other potentially life-threatening changes to what we used to know as social security.

  • JonnycJonny
    JonnycJonny Scope Member Posts: 253 Empowering
    edited October 2024

    I am afraid I cannot advise you on this.

    All I can say is that currently having some form of written evidence from a health professional regarding your functional limitations - though not a prerequisite - does help support and lend credence to a disability / ill health benefit claim - be it for PIP, ESA or UC ( LCW LCWRA )

    Best wishes

  • Charlie5
    Charlie5 Online Community Member Posts: 152 Contributor
  • Charlie5
    Charlie5 Online Community Member Posts: 152 Contributor
  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 4,229 Championing

    It is merely speculation and fear mongering yet again.

    Until Labour announce their intentions none one knows what is going to happen with the welfare budget.

  • Doglover2
    Doglover2 Online Community Member Posts: 442 Empowering

    "Handouts" gets my back up right right away. Making us sound like beggars.

    But I think we need to sit tight and wait, the media has a way of stirring it ,putting the "Able bodied " against us and making us squirm. And believe me I squirm.

    Makes me wish I was never born tbh.

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Online Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    It's the Torygraph, which is in the process of a buyout which is attracting bids from very dubious sources. If you're into conspiracy theories of dark money etc, look no further.

    Wouldn't believe a word of it, not from them anyway. First thing they want and easiest for them would be for us to attack each other and/or destroy ourselves. Let's not let them goad us.

  • BrianMcFaddenFan82
    BrianMcFaddenFan82 Online Community Member Posts: 89 Contributor

    This useless government couldn't handle anything any of us are going through even if their lives depend on it.

    They couldn't even fight their way out of a wet paper bag either for the matter.

    I would've said that they couldn't organise a booze up in a brewery, but they probably would.

    I have lots of health conditions myself including my depression which I've had for 22 years as I was diagnosed with postnatal depression, then clinical depression and now just depression.

    Every time I've asked for help for my depression, I'm on a high dose of antidepressants for at the moment, I get told to self refer to a local mental health charity, but all they do is a telephone consultation and then I get nothing from them.

    I've lost count of how many times I've asked for help that I've just given up asking for it.

    The government should be doing more to help people with long term health conditions not take it off them.

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 900 Championing

    I’ll post this very interesting snippet from a article published by the guardian today

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/oct/12/the-inside-story-of-labours-first-100-days-in-power-keir-starmer

    IMG_2566.jpeg

    The plot thickens as they say!

  • apple85
    apple85 Online Community Member Posts: 900 Championing

    Here’s the big question I have - what do labour class as a ‘mild mental health condition’?

    I’m going to play devils advocate here:

    We all know that applications for pip are going at a huge rate (there was a stat a few months back saying there was quarter of a million new pip applications over the summer months - that’s approx 0.36% of the total uk population which is a huge increase rate when you break things down) and the cost of living crisis is putting more ppl into desperate positions money wise.

    I don’t know where it’s like where the rest of live but ppl have openly been talking applying for pip by saying they have anxiety/depression (by reading the guides on how to successfully claim pip) to get extra funds

    I’m going to say something terrible here - mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety (which are life destroying/ending at its worse) are hard to officially diagnose but ‘easy’ (well perhaps not easy but more than possible) to fake some types of mental health condition.

    The bottom line is that getting the sickness elements of welfare down wouldn’t be such a focus priority of Tory of labour govs if claimant numbers hadn’t risen so rapidly since the pandemic (some of that explain by things like long covid but the large % of covid deceased being disabled would of balanced that a bit) - it is understandable why welfare reform is a focus for this gov as it is financially unsustainable

    However many on the scope forum feel all ppl that identify as having a health condition should get any sickness benefit they apply for, no questions asked and then left alone by the dwp (as lovely as that would be for dwp related anxiety reasons it’s just not a financial option and open to abuse by the true ‘scroungers’ of society)

    If things like pip are meant to be a safety net for disabled ppl (or a life raft) then there is no longer the space for all claimants so you need to figure out who loses a seat or doesn’t get on the boat altogether (and that’s a cold, brutal thing to say and I’m sorry for reaching that conclusion)

    Many have slammed me for saying the following before - but currently dwp assessment applications that are most successful in getting an award uses a certain ‘language’ (a specific way to present written information grammar wise - it’s hard to explain…….on a person note my past few reviews have been much more success since we found a charity to help fill in these forms that help fill in 100’s so have gotten very knowledgeable) - because of this some ppl learn how to con the system but other very vulnerable ppl with no access to support often fails in getting some help as they find it harder to process & utilise all the advice out there (I was talking to my psychiatrist about this last month and they agreed that this as a current flaw to the current welfare system)

    Another thing is that because of the sheer number of new pip applications and reviews this past 2 years prehaps the initial forms haven’t been under as much scrutiny as they were 5+ years back…..there does seem to be more paper based and shorter phone based decisions whilst the backlog is being cleared.


    if the ‘mild mental health conditions’ means that the dwp are going to be looking more closely on those getting a sickness benefit like pip solely based on things like depression & anxiety (and no other diagnosed conditions) where there’s no official diagnose (although I’d class those with mental health committed to hospital under the mental health act or similar as having equivalent to a diagnosis) then I honestly agree with the dwp - I do believe official diagnosis needs to play more of a role in getting awarded things like pip (especially considering that with many physical and behavioural disabilities anxiety/stress/depression are often a knock on condition triggered by the primary disability(s))


    what concerns me is that both labour and the dwp will have difficulty drawing that fine line between mental health conditions that are more ‘minor’ and more time limited/possible to treat compared more serious types of mental health that it’s more learning to live with and manage rather than ‘cure’ (some mental health issues can never be cured sad to say)

    It also worries me that more ‘common’ disabilities (that many public view as not a real condition) such as those with adhd and those on the autistic spectrum (which can be just a debilitating for ppl when compared to some more physical based disabilities) will be roped into this ‘mild’ definition - they are not mental health condition but complex disablities (often predispositioned to have mental health conditions on top of everything else) and axing these types of disabilities from eligibility would be a disaster (and cruel)


    I know the above will be an unpopular viewpoint but I understand some compromise will be needed in balancing any possible reform and strategy

    And right now neither labour nor the dwp are being realistic with their goals (but I also don’t think many disabled ppl are being 100% realistic when they claim there is zero they can contribute to society because of their health or disablity) - both disabled and dwp need to work together (though ball is currently in labours court as they have kind of ‘ghosted’ disabled ppl from the process of creating workable reforms)

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 313 Championing

    I found this article from the Guardian

    Pressure mounts on Rachel Reeves to drop ‘dangerous’ £1.3bn cut to benefits for disabled

    Rachel Reeves is coming under intense pressure to use the budget to abandon a £1.3bn cut to benefits for people with disabilities, first announced by the Tory government, amid warnings it will lead to hundreds of thousands of the most vulnerable people losing almost £5,000 a year.

    The leading independent thinktank, the Resolution Foundation, has called on the chancellor to drop or delay changes to the work capability assessment (WCA), arguing that key aspects of the policy have not been thought through, and that around 420,000 people who are unable to work through disability or ill-health could lose up to £4,900 a year.

    The controversy is another headache for the government, particularly as the savings from the Tory-conceived plan are already baked into the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecasts for the public finances that will underpin the budget on 30 October.

  • michael57
    michael57 Online Community Member Posts: 2,663 Championing

    the black hole would not be there if labours gordon brown had his one good eye on what he was doing when he sold off the gold so the black hole is labours making in the first place i myself think labour thinks it was the disabled and the pensioners that kept them out of power for so long and we are now there scapegoats time will tell no good fretting over it

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 313 Championing

    Anxiety and Depression are considered 'mild', however it can spiral into 'severe' MH conditions. It's a gateway into severity, when you get so low to the point where life isn't worth living anymore I would say that is severe.

    Graham Thorpe's passing should serve as a lesson that you can be successful at life, with wife and children and still you're depressed to the point you don't want to live anymore.

    Some people still don't seem to understand or comprehend the complexities and intricacies of mental illness, palming the depressed off will make things worse, it will put their wellbeing in peril.

    I understand how people can become insular, when the purse strings tighten you have to think about yourself and your predicament but at the end of the day we wouldn't be on this site if we didn't have our own crosses to bare and sometimes I feel that some tact is needed.

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Online Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    I strongly object to LCWRA being withheld from people without a diagnosis beyond D&A, they can be severe & debilitating, sometimes for life.

    Also, they are the only labels able to be officially diagnosed by a GP, when thousands of people cannot gain access to secondary services this may be the only label they get, even if they might have other diagnosable conditions with associated risk & disability.

    Then my category of people, and I admit I don't know how common this is, just that it affects me and would be a threat to my survival, which given I don't believe in life after death, means a lot to me…

    I have been having MH difficulties since childhood, definitely related to abuse, perhaps to other inherited issues which I have always declined to have confirmed, for several complex reasons. I am scared of diagnosis, I am also equally scared of being told that for 50 years there's been nothing wrong with me at all. Severe depression & anxiety have been my symptoms, of whatever lies underneath. I can't pick at that, because all my life I've been told I was made wrong, that I was defective, and bad. To get a label would be a confirmation of that to me, it would feel like I don't deserve to be here, that I never did.

    If I got told I didn't qualify for any diagnosis, it would mean that all these years I've been faking it, a complainer, deliberately avoiding adult responsibilities for no reason, been a burden to everyone and society.

    I am diagnosed with my symptoms. I have been able to access services for them, because I've had the will and the opportunity to get therapy, but the fact I'm still disabled by my mental health strongly suggests underlying problems. I'm just deathly scared to go down that route, if they change the rules I'll be in a real Catch 22, get a diagnosis = die, don't get a diagnosis = die. It wouldn't work for me.