nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

The transition to UC...finished

unsure65

After all the ups and down, the convoluted online forms with the entrapment questions, the pointless trip the DHSS office, I have say its wasn't as bad as expected but there could still make alot of improvements for people making the new claims.

I don't see how give someone 3 payments each months instead of 2 is alot simpler and better?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Kimi87

It's because UC is a means tested benefit designed to replace legacy means tested benefits.

Your son's ESA was part Contributions Based so that bit changed to New Style ESA, CB benefits are outside the remit of UC.

I agree there is (quite a lot of) room for improvement for the migration process 😊

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering