SUGGESTED PLAN TO REPLACE PIP WITH ANOTHER KIND OF BENEFIT ASSESSMENTI

axab43
axab43 Online Community Member Posts: 42 Contributor
edited February 24 in Current affairs

I have read of proposed plans to replace PIP with another kind of benefit assessment. Does anyone know how long that would take to come into affect. Would that still have to go through a Green Paper, white paper, go through parliament? I am getting pension in four years and the longer all this takes, the better I will feel, even if I lose money at the end of it. Thanks

Comments

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 2,197 Championing
  • Amberpearl
    Amberpearl Online Community Member Posts: 2,496 Championing

    I heard that too

  • axab43
    axab43 Online Community Member Posts: 42 Contributor

    I know none of us will know the exact details until next month. I was just wondering if anyone knew if they would have to put this through parliament and how long a bill usually takes to clear all stages. It would seem it would have to go through parliament, as I think everything like this does.

  • Kimi87
    Kimi87 Online Community Member Posts: 5,910 Championing

    If you are referring to the proposal by The Social Security Commission.

    They are a group of people who have lived experience of a system.

    They have released a survey about an idea they have had.

    It is in no way shape or form official Government policy.

    No official announcements have yet been made.

    They will be subject to the long process of becoming law.

    This takes years and what eventually becomes law is usually a watered down version of the original Green Paper proposals.

  • axab43
    axab43 Online Community Member Posts: 42 Contributor

    Yes, I was referring to that. Thank you for your answer. This is what I thought and this is reassuring (I have a lot of anxiety/mental health issues. Thanks.)

  • daisychain_99
    daisychain_99 Online Community Member Posts: 5 Listener

    It's absurd, isn't it! You would think they would realise how much money is being wasted on reassessing those with lifetime conditions.

  • noonebelieves
    noonebelieves Online Community Member Posts: 705 Championing
  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 2,197 Championing

    Yes you are right and maybe the government will agree with that when they make an official announcement later this month.

  • worried33
    worried33 Online Community Member Posts: 927 Championing
    edited March 8

    I did the survery a few days on that new proposal, but it isnt a government proposal, and I struggle to see the government accepting the proposals unless the payments were lower to compensate, as all they are interested in right now is spending cuts.
    The proposal includes the following (might be more, this is just what I remember).

    Everyone having access to a supporting organisation for help with applications and appeals.
    Panel to make decisions instead of one DM.
    Staff involved with decisions have to have knowledge of the problems.
    No descriptor and point system, but instead analysis on how the individuals daily life has being impacted.
    If conditions improve due to support being awarded, it cannot be used as a reason to remove support.
    More schemes similar to motability, scooters etc..

  • whistles
    whistles Online Community Member Posts: 2,046 Championing

    Surely all this change is costing the money they are trying to save?

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,227 Championing

    Whistles totally agree. It seems like all these changes might be costing more than they're actually saving in the long run.