nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Severe Conditions? No Reassessment?

emc123

((Those protected from reassessment will also be paid the higher rate of UC health top up of £97 per week, so they can live with dignity and security, knowing the reforms to the welfare system mean it will always be there to support them.))

What's the Criteria of these "Severe Conditions", as The 97pw is the present LCWRA amount so Does This Suggest those in Future on the Health Element are in this Severe Conditions Category & immune from Reassessment.

I've put a longer quote in comments

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

emc123

Those protected from reassessment will also be paid the higher rate of UC health top up of £97 per week, so they can live with dignity and security, knowing the reforms to the welfare system mean it will always be there to support them.

200,000 individuals in the Severe Conditions Criteria group - individuals with the most severe and permanently disabling conditions who will never be able to work - as they will not be called for reassessed for Universal Credit (UC) under new legislation.

FredFlintstone

My understanding of the "severe conditions" from the intial Bill, are those that are expected to last for life, with no chance of improving, with a diagnosis given by the NHS but not private doctors.

emc123

https://forum.scope.org.uk/discussion/comment/1038897#Comment_1038897

Thank you Fred :) x

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering