I received my PIP review and requested a mandatory reconsideration, as I had been awarded standard rates of both personal care and mobility. I believed, and still do that I should have been awarded the higher rate mobility component.
I have now received a letter regarding my mandatory reconsideration this morning, the 12th of June and they are sticking with the standard rates for both care and mobility.
“ we have used what you told us and all of the available evidence to make our decision”
there is no evidence, I was unable to provide any as I have not seen any specialist in my disorder for a number of years.
“we have reviewed the evidence including the assessment report”
I have not been assessed by anyone in person or on the phone so how could there be a report?
I still disagree with the mobility allowance I have been awarded, and I now I have had time to think about this, I now believe I should qualify for an increased award of the personal care component
I have no choice but to take this to the next stage and take it to tribunal, however I have no support.
I did reach out earlier this year to a benefits advisor for help with both my transition of housing benefit to UC housing element and my mandatory reconsideration as these happened at the same time, however the advisor was of no benefit whatsoever, starting with a complete lack of interest in my PIP claim and also getting the figures wrong regarding my transition from housing benefit to UC housing element despite my giving her all of the correct information. The figures were wrong, as a result I have no confidence in the organisation that was supposed to help with benefits advice.
Also registering with the DWP to make a challenge to this decision is going to be extremely difficult as I cannot use public transport and have no access to private transport therefore getting to any appointments with benefits advisors is going to prove very demanding physically, mentally and financially given the limited time I have to do this. And as I was told some years ago going forward with a challenge to benefits decisions without support is unlikely to be successful you can imagine what this is doing to me.
I need help.