Private (non NHS) diagnosis no longer accepted for PIP or UC Health element claim?

I found this comment by a poster in a topic on the benefitsandwork forum website -
There was no-one in his health authority at the time who could do a full autism diagnosis - the doctor was on long-term sick leave - (they could only do an indicative one) so it was followed up by a private one. I have heard that a private one will no longer be acceptable for a PIP or UC health element claim. (I wonder what Wes Streeting thinks of that?) Is this true?
As the poster says, is this true? If so, is it also true for any type of private consultation/assessment report?
Comments
-
Neither PIP or UC should be dependent on a diagnosis to qualify in the first place, a diagnosis helps substantiate as a form of evidence, but awards shouldnt be given on diagnosis alone (unless its terminal diagnosis).
3 -
One of my fears it that this NHS thing will also lead to disregard for aids and appliances, therapies, supplements we've needed and bought rather than prescribed by an NHS physio or OT… as though we're "dressing up" as disabled people.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 15.2K Start here and say hello!
- 7.2K Coffee lounge
- 87 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 117 Announcements and information
- 24K Talk about life
- 5.7K Everyday life
- 372 Current affairs
- 2.4K Families and carers
- 863 Education and skills
- 1.9K Work
- 519 Money and bills
- 3.6K Housing and independent living
- 1K Transport and travel
- 879 Relationships
- 255 Sex and intimacy
- 1.5K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 863 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 920 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.1K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 39K Talk about your benefits
- 5.9K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.5K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 8K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.6K Benefits and income