Universal Credit’s design just doesn’t work
Comments
-
DWP: they call APs "assessment periods," well my own assessment of this benefit—it is completely unfit for purpose. No amount of time will ever pass for me to warm to the design of Universal Credit. While the basic financial support is there for me, the structure itself is something I could never say I like, now or ever.
Even if you do get a twice-monthly setup, I know for a fact they would still prefer you to "learn to budget" and be good at budgeting their way like someone in monthly paid work.
1 -
Thankfully, 19-day gaps between the second payment of one month and the first of the following month don’t always happen. But even when the gaps are 16 or 17 days, it’s not truly fortnightly. Twice-monthly is simply not the same as fortnightly, and the old fortnightly setup was always much better. It is not a true like-for-like replacement, and of course, fortnightly would triumph in my thinking.
0 -
I'll tell you one thing: what he never should have done when designing Universal Credit was forcing a rigid monthly structure onto disabled people. Expecting everyone to magically conform to his narrow political agenda and budgeting ideals is completely out of touch with reality.
0 -
The so-called 'Alternative Payment Arrangements' provide zero rescue from the trap of the monthly assessment period. The whole system was built to force disabled folk into an impossible monthly budgeting mould just to serve a political agenda.
0 -
He definitely didn't wake up and suddenly feel sorry for what the DWP was doing to disabled people. If he had an ounce of sympathy, he never would have come up with the chaotic, destructive monthly structure of Universal Credit in the first place. Forcing disabled folk into a rigid monthly assessment and budgeting mould—with no real rescue from Alternative Payment Arrangements—was an entirely callous political choice.
0 -
I might sound intensely negative about Universal Credit, but it comes from a place of deep frustration with how the system is built. Don't get me wrong, the actual financial support is there for me—I receive the LCWRA component, which is a significant amount of money, and I'm grateful I don't have the pressure of work search conditions. But the delivery system is what completely ruins it. Nothing frustrates me more than the rigid monthly structure it's paid under. Fortnightly payments were always vastly superior for managing a budget, and these "twice-monthly" alternative arrangements are a poor substitute that don't fix the underlying problem.
0 -
I also receive the standard allowance for being single and over 25.
The baseline financial support is definitely there for me. But in my honest belief, the structure of how that money is delivered matters just as much as the amount.Forcing a monthly cycle leaves you facing brutal 16, 17, 18, or even 19-day gaps between payments. Trying to stretch your funds across those extra days at the end of the month is a nightmare. Truthfully, how can anyone claim this is better than the old fortnightly schedule? It's just not.
0 -
My assessment period runs from the 6th to the 5th of each month, with my payments set for the 12th and the 26th. Because this system operates on a twice-monthly frequency rather than a true fortnightly schedule, the gap between payments is highly inconsistent. For example, having received my second August payment on Wednesday, my next payment is not due until 11 September—creating a stressful 16-day gap.
0 -
If it were a proper fortnightly setup, I would be getting paid on 9 September instead. I appreciate having financial support, but I will never warm up to this structure. It forces an unnatural budgeting style on people, even if you try to manage it through an Alternative Payment Arrangement. Honestly, I miss the good old days and the reliable structure of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA).
0 -
To any claimants out there who defend the design of Universal Credit: you will never make me change my mind. In my world, it is definitely not the best thing since sliced bread. The system is fundamentally flawed.
0 -
Fortnightly rules—plain and simple. The 14-day payment cycle will forever be my preferred system. I completely reject this modern 'world of work' approach that constantly tries to force disabled people into artificial budgeting models. A true fortnightly routine wins for me every single day of the week.
0 -
Fortnightly rules, forever—nothing else compares. ❤️❤️❤️❤️💋💋💋💋
0 -
When you look at the mathematics, my overall entitlement comes to £854.70.
0 -
However, I entirely reject the structure in which these finances are distributed. When those long gaps happen between the second payment of one month and the first payment of the next, it feels exactly like staring into the dangerous gap between a train and the platform edge.
0 -
If I ever had the opportunity to confront Iain Duncan Smith, I would have some serious words with him. I would unleash a mountain of well-deserved negativity directly at him for his choices in designing Universal Credit.
0 -
Brilliant topic and brilliant comments from @UpTheTown11223344
0 -
Thank you for the positive feedback, @MrHappy2. I’m certainly not a Mr Happy when it comes to what I think of UC 🤣. It is impossible to support a system that leaves vulnerable claimants with gaps of over 14 days between essential payments.
Offering twice-monthly alternative payment arrangements does not resolve the issue of a true fortnightly gap. This mechanism is still entirely dependent on that GOD AWFUL rigid monthly assessment period structure, failing to address the systemic flaws inherent in the calculation window itself.
0 -
I used to get my ESA every 14 days on the dot. Under Universal Credit’s 'mimic monthly wage' structure, an APA still leaves gaps that stretch past 14 days. How can anyone expect me to support a system that is actively worse than the old one? It's just a **** system.
0 -
Does anyone actually prefer twice-monthly over fortnightly?
If anyone actually thinks the Universal Credit twice-monthly option beats the old legacy benefit ESA fortnightly payment cycle, then I would actually be shocked. It just comes across as baffling to me how anyone could think that waiting a couple of extra days for their next payment to go in is a good thing or a positive thing. Assessment periods that last 30 or 31 days are absolutely terrible, and the 7-day processing periods after an assessment ends are just as awful.
IAN DUNCAN SMITH, I LOATHE YOU! GRRRRRRRR 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥0 -
A design built around a calendar month, makes me tear my hair out more than once. This system is not in my best interests, it’s true, it does not suit me. No one can persuade me or change my mind. Thr fortnightly ESA cycle was much more kind to me.
Ian Duncan Smith, you wanted a system that mimics a monthly wage, but these extra waiting days between payments just fuel my rage. If you were to say that this system is working just fine, then you would be very much mistaken. 16, 17, 18 or even 19 day gaps, they don’t suit me! Why would they?!
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 16.4K Start here and say hello!
- 7.7K Coffee lounge
- 122 Games den
- 1.8K People power
- 188 Announcements and information
- 25.8K Talk about life
- 6.2K Everyday life
- 432 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 893 Education and skills
- 2K Work
- 623 Money and bills
- 3.8K Housing and independent living
- 1.2K Transport and travel
- 676 Relationships
- 1.6K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.6K Talk about your impairment
- 885 Rare, invisible, & undiagnosed conditions
- 947 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.3K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.3K Autism and neurodiversity
- 41.6K Talk about your benefits
- 6.2K Employment & Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20.6K PIP, DLA, ADP & AA
- 9.4K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.4K Benefits and income