We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
Hi @benjamin007
Bear in mind that the DWP may not take the view that you have actually improved, they may believe that you can walk around 50m which would have qualified for high rate mobility on DLA but is standard on PIP.
As regards mobility - you cannot now re-apply for the higher rate mobility on the basis of deterioration, as you are over the age threshold to claim (age 65), so the only way to get the high rate mobility back would be to win on appeal. The First-tier Tribunal have refused you, but you could still see if there is merit to challenge this to the Upper Tribunal. In order to do this, you need to write to the Tribunals Service with a copy of the decision, and ask for a Statement of Reasons and the Record of Proceedings (the Record of Proceedings is actually not required, but I think it's a useful addition), and you then need to find an error of law in the Statement.
Errors of law are not defined anywhere, but would include things like a failure to explain the reasons for the decision properly in the Statement of Reasons, mis-interpretation of the evidence/facts, mis-interpretation of the law, etc. If you had a representative who assisted you with the appeal they may be able to advise on this, if not then try and find a rep in your area who can have a look at the Statement for you - if you are based in the north of England, Bolton Citizens Advice have the legal aid Upper Tribunal contract there, I'm not sure about Midlands or south...
As regards your mental health deterioration - this is certainly something that can be looked at on reassessment. If you wish to be reassessed for this, as you say, you will need to call PIP and go through the process again.
It's correct that the Tribunal did not look at any deteriorations in your condition, and sometimes if deteriorations are discussed in the hearing it can reduce the chances of success, as it leads the Tribunal to the (sometimes incorrect) conclusion that if the person was better at the time than they are now they would not have qualified...
Hope this helps - let us know if you need any more info.
Kind regards,
Mary
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering