We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
justg72 said: The narratorSorry to hear that you have lost your PIP, I have uncontroled treatment resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. I was getting enhanced for both, in March I went for my F2F assessment and I was awarded 0 for both. I did not even score a point, even though my condition has not improved at all. I then appealed the decision with an M.R. and I then was awarded mobility. I am now taking it to a tribunal as I do not agree with the decision. However mine is different as there was many errors which occurred and I have put a complaint in regarding this matter. They have admitted to a number of errors and are still making more. I have all the evidence and they are not doing anything about it so I now have to take it to an independent, case, examiner. You mentioned that you can still drive, does that mean that you have not had a seizure for 1 year? I have lost my driving licence because of my epilepsy. If this is the case I do not think they will award you PIP as your seizures are under control and they have to affect you more than 50% of the time, it is called the 50% rule for people with epilepsy. You can find this link on the scope site.Epileptic people are the ones mostly affected and have lost PIP because of this. My epileptic nurse said that all her patients are now refused PIP, not one has been awarded PIP! and all of her patients have to take it further!What does that tell you its disgusting, I think its damn right discrimination against people with epilepsy. Just go on the epilepsy sites and read the stories. There wanting M.P.s to sign the epileptic pledge, this is all about PIP and epilepsy.Have a read and see what you think. Anyway good luck with your PIP.
poppy123456 said: Decisions very rarely change at MR stage, it's less than 20% success rate. Tribunal success rate is 71% for those that appear in person. Expect to have to take it to Tribunal is my advice. Waiting times for Tribunal are huge because backlogs are long right across the country. Some are waiting 1 year for their hearing. A long process.
The_narrator said: quick update on this got my MR back today again denying all points even goes as insulting to state that the issues i disagree with would mean dvla would not allow me to drive again their using the dvla as an escape goat how would they know in such a short time what dvla medical guidelines are in reference to my case
Yadnad said: The_narrator said: quick update on this got my MR back today again denying all points even goes as insulting to state that the issues i disagree with would mean dvla would not allow me to drive again their using the dvla as an escape goat how would they know in such a short time what dvla medical guidelines are in reference to my case I applaud the individual in the DWP who dreamed up this scenario. It started off in drips draps within ESA decision notices. It then found it's way into the national database of cut and paste statements throughout the DWP PIP & ESA systems.It effectively says that anybody that admits to driving a car AND is claiming either mental or physical conditions that severely impact on their life then those claims of impact are easily undermined as it is accepted common sense that driving is something that you need good mental and physical skills to have.I do wonder how by using this statement for all claimants if they admit to driving a car they can logically take on a Motability lease vehicle for the claimant to personally drive?
The_narrator said: nope the dvla have allowed me to keep it under medical review i dont know what guidelines they use but i just dont see how the pip DM can get away with useing that as an excuse as that only affects driving not abiltiy too just allowance of
The_narrator said: my thoughts exactly my exes aunty is on enhanced rate mob and has a lease car and is the named driver from my understanding of his statement effectively she should not be on the scheme or enititled to it as shes able to drive irregardless of what condition you have prior
LittleGizmo86 said: @thenarratorI am not sure who at the DVLA said these things but their own criteria is seizure free for 12 months or you cant drive. Simple! There is no rule for knowing you are going to have one as you cannot guarantee a safe place to pull over?!It isnt very often i agree with the DWP but i am affraid if you are having 50 seizures a week that are causing memory issues and falls and other dangerous things then you would not be suitable to drive and should have had your licence removed.If you are as bad as you say then this would have been mentioned to the DVLA by the dr that fills in your medical forms? Does your dr know how bad things are?Im affraid im with the DWP on this.... something doesnt add up.Please if you really are as bad as you say... for the love of god stop driving!
Paul7210 said: . Remember also the DWP and DLVA are linked so they will see what your allowed to do driving wise.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering