We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
petulerose said: hi to keep this brief I have congenital Spinal defect & receiving cancer treatment. A malicious phone call in 2017 resulted in being interviewed in 2018 iuc. (Cctv footage gathered by dwp) Received letter from pip benefit suspended without right to appeal jan 2019. no explanation from dwp. I have medical evidence to prove my condition varies. what happens next? Will I received a letter telling me why my pip has been suspended? If so how long does it take to be informed? And then what?im sure someone on this forum has faced a similar situation Thanks
petulerose said: hi to keep this brief I have Spina Bifida & treatment for breast cancer. A malicious phone call in Aug 17 resulted in being interviewed in Aug 18 iuc. (Cctv footage gathered by dwp) Received letter from pip benefit suspended without right to appeal jan 19. no explanation from dwp. I have medical evidence to prove my condition changes. Doctors documents supported my application for pip. Forms filled in by welfare rights. My health can change hourly but never improves for any great length of time What does this mean?what happens next?please only practical information I don’t want a debate on you must have done something wrong, because I don’t think I have done anything wrong. I stated this in my iuc I’m not guilty. Thanks
stree said: I think Yadnad has probably identified the issue:Many people still think that a batch of appointment letters, a diagnosis and a list of meds is proof enough when in fact it is the effect of the condition on your life that is the criteria, the aforementioned is merely to confirm the condition (and its severity) exist.I will stress once again that a daily or weekly diary of how your condition affects you is invaluable for giving the assessor a clearer picture of your circumstances.
stree said: Fair point, I can agree with that although it is likely an area that some may well claim the under reporting of distance for fear of being judged more capable than they really are, and will feel especially vulnerable to misinterpretation by the HCP.
stree said:OP states that that Welfare Rights filled in the forms, perhaps the issue lies there? I prefer to do my own but that is not possible or best for everyone, but the more people in the mix the more chance of error.Whoever fills the form in they must always be double checked.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering