If this is your first visit, check out the community guide. You will have to Join us or Sign in before you can post.
Receiving too many notifications? Adjust your notification settings.
Terminated assessment experience

Can I be forgiven for thinking that in order to be employed to conduct asssessments for ESA & PIP you are required to have an exceptional ability for what can only be described as blatant, bare-faced lies?
Replies
Would it be safe to assume you've recently had a bad assessment experience? If so, will you be appealing?
Scope
If you have a few minutes to spare, we'd appreciate your feedback on our online community.
From your post I gather you have had a bad experience at the hands of an assessor like so many others. However they are not all bad . I have had both good and bad, but most people don't come onto a forum like this to tell us about positive outcomes.
If you need any guidance to appeal please let us know
Good Afternoon & Welcome it’s great to meet you today.
I am one off the Community Champion’s here at Scope.
Sorry but I assume that you have experienced a bad Benefit Appointment??
Do you want to talk about it???
Or is there any info/support that I offer you????
@steve51
Hi there
Oh, another satisfied customer from the PIP assessment I assume lol. What they are really good at is causing annoyance, anxiety and stress.
Don't take it personal they are designed to reject everyone. Don't give up though. Please, please. please keep fighting. The more we challenge, the more we change. The only justice where PIP is concerned is in the Tribunal. You will get there. You will.
@allergic2idiots I do hope your complaint gets you somewhere, but I have to say I would be doubtful as they rarely (rightly or wrongly) do.
As regards the Nursing and Midwifery Council. They have been widely criticised for their alleged white washing of complaints on this and other major issues to such an extent that there have been calls for their abolition. That's not a reason to not complain in itself but a complaint in which you start by unquestioningly leaving a room because you were asked to without explanation and then suffered no financial loss or distress isn't going to be top of anyone's compelling cases which ought to clearly win list.
Best of luck with the complaint @allergic2idiots.
Scope
If you have a few minutes to spare, we'd appreciate your feedback on our online community.
I've no doubt I can say nothing to make you pause here but a point of principle needs to have something solid attached to it.
He may not be factually accurate in his recall; may indeed have not be truthful at all; absolutely ought to have offered an explanation for termination (although he's not obliged and may not do so if he thought it obvious e.g. if you swore; were perceived as threatening; threatened to terminate it yourself and many other circumstances) but none of that is relevant if the outcome is that you got your correct entitlement and weren't harmed nor distressed.
The danger is that you get labelled a vexatious litigant. In the long term that can do you more harm than anything you possibly appear able to gain here.
Your obtuse reference to "rather more disclosure" worries me greatly.
If you're giving your version of events on a public forum then do so. There's nothing I know of which would hold you back legally at this point if all you're doing is complaining to ICE and the N&MC. It allows others to infer, rightly or wrongly, that you're not being entirely straight with us. In what already looks like a rather strange and obtuse complaint I'm not sure that's your best move. You already have a user name and an original post at the top of this thread which infers a confrontational approach. Nowt wrong with that of course in isolation. However, taken in the round I'm afraid I'm not taking this at face value at all.