nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Is it normal for decision maker's MR report to be word for word the same as the original report?

C984

Hi I am just interested if this has happened to you at all my limited capability assessment was denied and I asked for a copy of the decision makers report for the reason why this report was nothing to do with me and my case so I did a mandatory reconsideration and again this was denied so I asked for a copy of the decision makers report again for the reason why it was denied it has come back and the report is the same as last time.e word for word has this happened to anyone or has anyone heard of this. Its comes across that they haven't bothered looking over my case again and just fobbed me off

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

poppy123456

HI,

Yes, perfectly normal for the MR decision to be a copy and paste of the original decision.

C984

Why is it normal for the report to be the same as I sent medical evidence to support the my case and none of this was never used

poppy123456

MR success rate is about 50% but that's falling fast. If the decision doesn't change it's usually a copy and paste of the original decision. Medical evidence is only helpful if it states how your conditions affect you and most doesn't.

Did you give a couple of real world examples for each descriptor that applies to you. Adding information such as where you were, what exactly happened, did anyone see it and what the consequences were? If you didn't then i'd advise you to do this.

Have you also looked at the descriptors for LCW and LCWRA? See them both in these links.

https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/wca-limited-capability-work-assessment-descriptors

https://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/universal-credit-uc/uc-faq/3904-limited-capability-for-work-related-activity

I'd advise you to get some expert advice and if you can get representation then even better. Start here for this. https://advicelocal.uk/

calcotti

C984 said:

Why is it normal for the report to be the same as I sent medical evidence to support the my case and none of this was never used

A perfectly reasonable question to which the only reasonable answer would, in my opinion, be it shouldn't be like that. Even if the new DM comes to the same conclusion as the original DM there really should be a reference to additional information provided (if it has been). However, as poppy says, medical evidence isn't necessarily helpful as PIP isn't about diagnosis, it's about impact and medical letters are usually silent on that score.

poppy123456

calcotti said:

C984 said:

Why is it normal for the report to be the same as I sent medical evidence to support the my case and none of this was never used

PIP isn't about diagnosis, it's about impact and medical letters are usually silent on that score.

Agreed although this was a WCA but the same applies to LCW, it's not about a diagnosis.

C984

Hi Thanks for that yes these was further medical evidence plus statements form medical professionals and my surgeon aswell the first DM report was a complete disgrace and made no sense and parts of the report was false and made out I can do things I can't do. But the second report is word for word the same they have not taken the time to read the information provided and evidence I have sent them it makes no sense as the reports should be different as it's different people who look at these cases

poppy123456

There's nothing you can do about that now so my advice it to move on and concentrate on the Tribunal. If you haven't already given those real world examples then you should think about doing that at some point after you've submitted your Appeal request.

C984

Hi poppy

Thanks for the yes I have already started the appeal process on this as I said its didn't make sense why the decision makers statement were both the same thanks for your advice

AndrewHall

The good thing is you have four opportunities to state your case. The initial application form, at Medical assessment, MR and the Tribunal.
Good luck.