We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
anj54 said: Hii had my telephone assessment and requested my notesim really shocked to find no points.im very confused that the assessor has put thing in like needs help getting in and out of bath but no points?She has cut and pasted the same paragraph in each box saying I used to drive 2 years ago?? She’s has also said I don’t take daily medications which I do?I work part time from home and have adapted keyboard and mouse but in the report says I can cook a simple meal because I can use a mouse?I have RR Ms by the way she also said I have yearly scans which is normal but this year I have had 2I just am so shocked at the report do they even look at the medical evidence when they are on the phone to you?any help would be much appreciated xx
leeCal said: As the dm eventually sees these reports copying and pasting in this way must be condoned, I mean they receive some sort of training to do this, seems odd that the person conducting the assessment isn’t the one who awards points, after receiving a mess of copying and pasting and not passing on what the assessed has said how on earth can the dm have an accurate picture?! Not always possible I suggest, hence the number of MRs.
OverlyAnxious said: Being able to drive is one you'll see quite often in a PIP refusal. It's because it takes a certain amount of mental & physical ability, so they use that basis to make wide ranging assumptions in relation to the other tasks... Sadly, it's not that simple in real life of course.
Username_removed said: Not sure I see an issue with copying and pasting. If the same reason has been used to score someone points across multiple descriptors that’s not really a surprise. Why should you have to find 10 different ways to say the same thing? The issue is drawing the wrong inference rather than copying and pasting. The bottom line remains that a HCP can only draw a wrong inference if a PIP 2 has not been fully completed.
leeh098 said: Username_removed said: Not sure I see an issue with copying and pasting. If the same reason has been used to score someone points across multiple descriptors that’s not really a surprise. Why should you have to find 10 different ways to say the same thing? The issue is drawing the wrong inference rather than copying and pasting. The bottom line remains that a HCP can only draw a wrong inference if a PIP 2 has not been fully completed. The assessor in my case has definitely got it wrong, I will be making a MR, And taking it further as I feel the assessment was a load of rubbish, It stated on my PIP form my problems, And Also on the Evidence I sent from Autism Diagnoses Services, It seems like what ever she says goes, After a brief 30 minute assessment, Which she lied on that too stating it lasted 45 minutes.
poppy123456 said: leeh098 said: Username_removed said: Not sure I see an issue with copying and pasting. If the same reason has been used to score someone points across multiple descriptors that’s not really a surprise. Why should you have to find 10 different ways to say the same thing? The issue is drawing the wrong inference rather than copying and pasting. The bottom line remains that a HCP can only draw a wrong inference if a PIP 2 has not been fully completed. The assessor in my case has definitely got it wrong, I will be making a MR, And taking it further as I feel the assessment was a load of rubbish, It stated on my PIP form my problems, And Also on the Evidence I sent from Autism Diagnoses Services, It seems like what ever she says goes, After a brief 30 minute assessment, Which she lied on that too stating it lasted 45 minutes. You applied last year also but were refused back then. Either you don't qualify and some people don't because you can have a disability but not qualify for PIP. Or you're clearly doing something wrong and as Mike has already stated, poorly completed claim packs are often to blame. The length of time the assessment took makes no difference here.
BangersNMash said: I know how you feel, I just received my decision back that included the report and it's quite disgusting what they have written, totally ignoring what you have said on the phone. They had written multiple times that I had no specialist input, yet I had sent copies of the letters from " Specialists ", they stated I don't take anxiolytics, when I clearly said on the phone I'm taking Citalopram, which was also written on the PIP form and evidence of repeat prescriptions, plus many more things the failed to include.It's basically a joke, the assessors should be ashamed of themselves.Also if a person can't walk over 200m, how the hell can an assessor assess that over the phone?
DuffersMum said: OverlyAnxious said: Being able to drive is one you'll see quite often in a PIP refusal. It's because it takes a certain amount of mental & physical ability, so they use that basis to make wide ranging assumptions in relation to the other tasks... Sadly, it's not that simple in real life of course. Very true..I was only awarded standard mobility after my first assessment because I could drive a car, despite it being painful to do so but they don’t care about that...some of these assessors are not fit for purpose...mine said I could walk fine because I’m swapped my walking stick between hands...which is what my physio told me do if there was a railing on the side I usually hold my stick in...she also said I arrived carrying my handbag, notes and a bottle of water....my bottle of water was in my handbag which my husband was carrying for me...I have a friend who was once a nurse and made the mistake of becoming an assessor...she lasted a matter of weeks saying..in her words “I wasn’t prepared to bend the truth or lie on the assessment reports”
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering