New Green Paper Discussion - now includes accessible formats and consultation event sign up links!

Great, I may have put it a bit double dutch, if I don't get contacted I won't use, is what I meant, and those that have given sites to look at "Links" I welcome them and add to the appropiate sections of the document.

I say document as this one has taken chapter and verse and cross referencing back to 2008 when I did an A to Z of benefits which is still being added to and amended to EVERY DAY.

THANKS AGAIN, to everyone here contributing IN EVERY WAY, as we have said case histories, and outcomes are the start, the mid section is the AMENDMENTS MADE TO THE LAW, TRIBUNAL, OR CLAIMENTS DETAILS - GOOD OR BAD - AND IF THE CLAIM WENT UP OR DOWN WITH WHAT THEY USED - ANY COMPENSATION.

IT HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT COMPENSATION, but the charters and laws placed on us to claim benefits of any sort. This latest change being one. I have not spent the last 4 years getting the Social Care Package in place to have an accountant tell me she can change it with NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.

All supporting evidence must 1. State the reason for the change.

2. must state the original draft in law.

3. must state the expected outcome.

4. must state an exceptable period to implement it and see results.

5. If this is a longer period of implemenmtation then, unless you can state why, (and release of funding later is not a reason for change.) You have not budgeted correctly since if you are loosing money you already know the reason, which is normally bad admin at top, using others to support the errors of their management, with more miss management.

6. Review the implementations after 1 month/2 months/6 months to make sure you are on track and that any errors that are shown up, are rectified on the run. ( in other words being monitored until targets are met.)

7. If there is no way to implement changes, then don't change the system.

8. MORE IMPORTANTLY, all amendments made after the FIRST DRAFT, MUST BE SHOWN AS AN AMENDMENT AND LOGGED.

Number 8. is where the DWP and PIP Mare falling apart. Since (I have stated before) EVERY tribunal result MUST be logged, because, - if an assessor is not using the "up to date" forms then every assessment s/he does is suspect? By logging the reason why the assessment cannot be used, the DWP and PIP can see how many "rejections there are" and show this to us.

This added recently.

REBUTTAL TO TRIBUNAL 23RD APRIL 2025.

REFERENCE QUOTE FROM A SCOPE FORUM IN ANSWER TO INFORMATION ALREADY GIVEN.

"It seems there may be some misunderstanding regarding my request. It is not my responsibility to verify the claims you've made. If you are confident in their accuracy, please provide the specific sources, legal references, or official documents that support them. These claims cannot be treated as established facts without clear evidence."

I'm not responsible for DWP's actions or lies, nor can I explain 15 years of treachery in 15 minutes. If you wish to make a difference, then read what I've suggested.

Otherwise, as I've said twice, please stop telling me I am wrong when you don't (yet) know what I'm talking about. My comprehension is acute, but typing and explaining myself is exhausting. Not understood/not believed is the same to me.

I think the reviewer was Paul Litchfield, and Professor Harrington was the government's medical advisor, but these are minor points and make no difference to my claims. Read DNS reports for the facts about those WCA reviews. Or don't.

I will when a submission to the court next week will be including this and others for REFERENCE AND JOGGING NOTES FOR ME, to understand how, and why we are having drastic reforms to a system that can be used, but due to the "Blurring of the edges" and I make no excuse for me or them since I deal in plain English and apply the same laws that are use to inflict misery and shame on the NHS when the people who are running the "show" do not realise what half, and that is being generous, more live 98% of support both financially and medically has now been taken over by them. (DWP/PIP)

I will also be mentioning the Charters and Laws that govern the assessment process, and ask:
What is the purpose of an assessment for benefit? (ANY BENEFIT)
What charter is used to allow a claimant to be called in for an assessment?
Is their a set period between assessments, and how is this policed. And, if someone is starting to claim any benefits for the first time, who or where is their first port of call, or go to person/department?

I already know this but since the Secretary of State is Duty bound to attend, I will only be reinforcing what I have said about the system and its administration, and the loss of administration by the NHS when blaming the NHS for the problems that we are now in, when it is the administration of the system, where many people including Professor Harrington, Paul Litchfield, Dr Mike Orton (may not be known by many, but took over from Pro. Harrington, the Grayling report, and all the white papers presented to parliament twice in one year, have spent 1000's of hours trying to explain what is wrong with the system, but then bring out their own version, from ours.
That would not be so bad, but, in altering small words changes the WHOLE CONTEXT OF THE STATEMENT. One such example in the 4 point ruling is changing the Billions of pounds investment into the Disabled and NHS to get it up and running, has been changed to we are now investing in getting "people" into work?
THIS is an inclusion of EVERYONE NOT WORKING?
SORRY this will be asked.....