New Green Paper Discussion - now includes accessible formats and consultation event sign up links!

18485868890

Comments

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 210 Empowering

    "Can anyone be worse than starmer reeves Kendall Timms ?"

    I would need at least two or three months to find one who's worse than this quartet evil.

  • Dianaf
    Dianaf Online Community Member Posts: 83 Empowering

    Kendal has an evil face like reeves.

  • Donna_donna
    Donna_donna Online Community Member Posts: 32 Empowering

    I truly believe that the whole 4 point situation has been being planned for years.

    Hence why the vast majority of us don't ever get given those 4 points.

    It doesn't matter who the current gruberment is ,this was going to be implemented regardless.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 210 Empowering

    Guess what - last year around this time, Labour gained 186 additional councillor seats. While in these elections they've lost 198 seats.

    Good for them.

    I'm glad I didn't vote labour during the last GE, even though I used to be a Labour Party member. Since I saw the writing on the wall, I just voted the Greens just for the sake of not voting Keir Starmer's Labour.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 210 Empowering

    For sure, all the successive governments of the past few decades have been thinking and planning to cut sickness and disability benefits in one way or another.

    Imagine, out of all the claimants who are currently receiving PIP only 7% have scored 4 points on one descriptor in the Daily Living component!

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 821 Championing

    I wish Sunak hadn’t left , I doubt he would have been as bad as them . Mel stride is another matter.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 821 Championing

    my last assessor was steering me away from 4 point answers , in fact on at least one descriptor I scored a 4 point but was given a 2 .

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 821 Championing

    She always looks demented and her face contorted with her hate for the disabled.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 210 Empowering

    "We need to go further and faster" has become the new fraudulent misleading slogan of Kier Starmer and his clowns!


    The sister of Rachel Reeves, Ellie Reeves, Labour Party chairwoman, is parroting it too:

    "We’ve got our Plan for Change, we’re beginning to see the results of this, but we know we need to go further and faster".

  • Topcat71
    Topcat71 Online Community Member Posts: 131 Empowering

    I explain to Ai how I feel at the moment and this is how it responded to my thoughts.

    "It sounds like you're feeling a sense of resignation mixed with a desire to fight. It's a difficult position to be in. Remember that even if the odds seem stacked against you, collective action can sometimes create unexpected change"

  • Topcat71
    Topcat71 Online Community Member Posts: 131 Empowering

    No matter who you vote in they just change and become just as bad or even worse than the ones they criticize. Thanks labour it's 3.30 am I can't sleep with worry.

  • Ranald
    Ranald Online Community Member Posts: 1,025 Championing
    edited 2:55AM

    Who "wants to dim the sun"? That's sounds like the chemtrail conspiracy theory.

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,129 Championing

    Ed Miliband has set aside £50 million for studies on geoengineering. Scientists will run outdoor tests to see if blocking some sunlight can help fight climate change. This has nothing to do with the chemtrail conspiracy.

    The government is investing nearly £22 billion over the next 25 years in carbon capture and storage. This technology helps trap pollution from factories and power plants before it reaches the air.

  • alexroda
    alexroda Online Community Member Posts: 162 Empowering

    Ed Miliband and the scientists proposing that are dumb and evil. Just saying

    Blocking sunshine to fight climate change?! 🙂‍↔️😨😞

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,129 Championing

    Just to clarify, I wasn’t expressing support for geoengineering, just sharing the facts. It looks like @Ranald thought @Catherine21 was referring to the chemtrail conspiracy, but she was actually providing relevant information.

    Myself and other members were discussing this in a separate thread related to this subject earlier this week, so it’s definitely a topic that sparks strong reactions!

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 294 Empowering

    bill gates , and you know what ? the chemtrails are real , they are poisoning us in my opinion , and you call it conspiracy but what I see with my own eyes is the truth .

    I have a right to my opinion as you do you . Peace .

  • onebigvoice
    onebigvoice Scope Member Posts: 910 Pioneering

    As a Comment on how things went in the election:

    The reform seem to be doing well…. Why do you think that?

    Some voters are not amused with the previous government and the way they were running things, so when the vote came for a change voted Labour in to "help" But even looking at the hipe, hitting the ground running was not what we agreed. Yes there was a need for system reform, but some have to realise that Wales in general is RED alread.

    So what has changed:- No winter fuel payments for some that already received it, others not getting it because the "rise" in Pensions pushed them over the threshold of what they could live on.

    Have you (the government) forgot what the rise was for? Finally an increase in the Cost of pensioners but in giving them the rise took it back off you in TAX. Have you really thought this through? Yes I believe this was the intention since to look as though you had a rise on paper but as I stated at the time in real terms it impacted on ALL other benefits received by pensioners.

    This also applies to any one on benefits of any sort, by increasing the Basic Wage for people of working age, it doesen't take a rocket scientist to see what it actually achieved in real terms to people in their pockets.

    So how is all this applied to SCOPE and the people who visit this site……

    Yes I can list again the points of what has been achieved against what we have actually gained with BUDGET FIGURES and investments made since in power, but, in real terms ……… To assist the people that they were supposed to help in the first place, REFORM have stated that "each Councillor" each Mayor will be applicable for their own budgets. This is not new but the innitial "orders of what to fix and how to get voters to change has.

    It was ability to MOBALISE "troupes on the goround as we have found out by winning a Labour hold by 6 VOTES.

    This is your chance to be one of those 6 and make a difference to the future.

    By saying that if you don't vote or make your vote known as to whether you support or don't support the changes being made then straight away you will loose my vote.

    Why be an MP or AM, Councillor or Mayor if you do not state your intentions before the vote? Any one that has not press released their intention would in my eyes loose my vote.

    I do not wish this to be a political opinion, but, support for SCOPE and support in posting issues here allow admin to formulate papers and report that some may not see happening, but believe me as a Member of Scope and the Senedd where we had a vote last year and I became lucky enough to become one of these members, I have combined what I was already doing within Labour, Unite the Union in support actions being taken around the country, the retired section of Unite and pension rights and more importantly with SCOPE, have access our rights as Disabled people, people on long term sick, or people who now find that your PENSION IS BEING TAXED AS UNEARNED INCOME.

    If this is the case then as a means tested benefit, I must be entitled to other means tested benefits?

    Only one question to ask, Why was my TAX Allowances increased like those who had an increase in the Basic Living Wage?

    Sorry guys the thresholds of how many hours you need to work to get U C has not chjanged in line with the increases, so where 16 hours a week would give you "X" amount of earnings which were topped up by UC infact the same amount of hours now gets you a £320 REDUCTION IN YOU UC AMOUINT? (over the month)

    So are you better off? I was better off with out there help.

    Finally: You need to realise that being one of these six people has changed every thing, so if you want to make a difference and remembering how many votes are held by SCOPE members, by Pensioners, by people claiming benefits, they ALL ADD UP.

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 156 Empowering

    There is also a petition on the Green Paper if people would like to sign it, thanks.

    https://chng.it/SZQ87WyHHc

  • YogiBear
    YogiBear Online Community Member Posts: 187 Empowering

    I'm posting this from the Benefits and Works site for information and it may be beneficial to make our MP's aware of this.

    News

    Academics show Labour is overwhelmingly targeting its own voters with PIP cuts

     Published: 03 May 2025

    A group of academics from Northern universities and health services have calculated how much income each Westminster parliamentary constituency may lose as a result of personal independence (PIP) cuts.  Labour constituencies take 92 of the top 100 biggest losers places, with the North East and North West hardest hit, suggesting that PIP cuts are aimed squarely at Labour’s own voters.

    The, report was funded and produced by Health Equity North and carried out by academics from the universities of Manchester, Newcastle and Sheffield, along with the Northern Health Service Alliance.

    Researchers looked at how many PIP claimants in each constituency did not score four points or more for any daily living activity. They then calculated what the loss of PIP for those claimants would mean in total for each constituency as well as what the loss per head of working age population would be.

    Researchers found that:

    • The ten worst-hit constituencies are all Labour-held, and in “Red Wall” areas
    • The impacts will disproportionately affect the constituencies which already have the lowest life expectancies in England.
    • They found that the average loss per working age adult in England is £176
    • The changes are set to have the greatest effect on regions such as the North East (£269 per working-age person on average), the North West (£231), Yorkshire and The Humber (£206), the West Midlands (£191) and the East Midlands (£185)
    • The worst-hit constituencies are in Easington (£409 per working-age person), Liverpool Walton (£403) and Knowsley (£389)
    • These three constituencies alone could lose an estimated total of £23.8m, £26.2m and £23.4m respectively per year by 2029/30

    In fact, because these calculations did not take into account the possible loss of other linked benefits and the loss of additional elements in other benefits, the actual figures could be very considerably higher.

    One of the report’s authors, Professor Clare Bambra, said:

    “Those areas that will lose most from this proposal were already decimated by austerity, COVID and the cost of living crisis. They have worse health than other regions and their local services and economies are already struggling. Losses of this magnitude risk worsening the situation for everyone living in these deprived constituencies.

    “Parliament cannot risk rushing proposals like these through without fully considering how they affect local areas that are already struggling. We hope that research such as ours gives MPs more context, so they can make the most informed, forward-thinking and economical decision.”

    Readers with a Labour MP, in particular, might want to drop them an email drawing attention to this report.

    You can read more and download a copy of Local Economic Impact of the Proposed Changes to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) by Parliamentary Constituency

  • Passerby
    Passerby Posts: 210 Empowering

    A single country investing £22 billion in reducing its CO2 emissions is nothing more than a drop in the ocean, as long as every single country on the planet is not making a transparent and measurable sustainable effort in this regard.

    And yet, even if emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2) were stopped altogether and put to zero today, it would still take many thousands of years for atmospheric CO2 to cool and return to the conditions of 200 years ago due to its very slow transfer to the deep ocean and ultimate burial in ocean sediments.