The Universal Credit Bill becomes law. Here are the changes to disability benefits you need to know

12021232526

Comments

  • MW123
    MW123 Scope Member Posts: 1,487 Championing

    Totally hear the frustration, but just to say I am holding fire until the full White Paper is published. What is being pushed now is still based on the £5 billion plan from earlier this year, and the harshest parts were already softened after pushback from MPs, charities and the public. Existing claimants remain protected under those amendments.

    Starmer’s reset might look like a power grab, but it does not mean he has everyone under his thumb. The bill has not passed in full, scrutiny continues, and charities are already preparing responses.

    We will have the opportunity to push back, just as we did before. Not all MPs are under his thumb; I have no doubt some are already quietly sharpening their amendments.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 878 Championing

    Could you please quote what I've said in this regard, as I can't remember it?

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 878 Championing

    Hi Danny.

    Yep, I'm still in the same dinghy boat as you.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing
    Screenshot_20250904_124326_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20250904_124335_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20250904_124350_Chrome.jpg

    I'm still waiting migrstion letter

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing
  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    Just to make aware do not read if feeling anxious

    Screenshot_20250904_133233_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133248_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133305_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133322_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133332_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_132959_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133342_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133407_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg Screenshot_20250904_133415_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg
  • Albus_Scope
    Albus_Scope Posts: 11,070 Scope Online Community Coordinator

    @Catherine21 I'd just like to mention that Stephen Timms was at the roundtable for co production with disabled people on Wednesday, which was also attended by Scope, so I can confirm he is turning up to appointments featuring disabled peoples benefits.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    Oh OK why would john pring say he wasn't so that's really really good to hear thankyou

  • Albus_Scope
    Albus_Scope Posts: 11,070 Scope Online Community Coordinator

    Not all independent news is reported correctly @Catherine21 I'd say it's best to wait for official announcements. 😊

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    Don't hold much faith in this lot I can't stop worrying about not getting migration letter its always something

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 878 Championing

    I've gone through reading the whole thread and there's nowhere I've said anything about bank checks and anything that's related to it. It must have been someone else.

    No, they don't check claimants' bank accounts every 28 days, as they don't have access to claimants' bank accounts.

  • Socrates63
    Socrates63 Online Community Member Posts: 44 Contributor

    I do apologise passerby, I must have got you mixed up with another post on here. Don't know how I did that.

    But did read your last post where you said it wasn't you, but regarding bank checks, I can only repeat what the telephone appointment person said to me on 2 separate occasions, which was they asked for my bank details in all bank accounts and any monies going over their limit means the forfeit of money being reduced and /or stopped altogether! so if they don't have access like you say, what's the point in asking me for it? I'm very confused by it all. Anyways, sincere apologies passerby and look through my previous posts and see if I can see what I was trying to get at. Yours sincerely

    Socrates.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 878 Championing

    I believe they see it on the four months bank statements you submitted to them. I'm sure they don't have access to claimants' bank accounts and how much money these have got on their bank accounts to date. So far, only when a serious benefit fraud is involved and the claimant is sued in courts can they request banks to disclose certain financial information of the claimant's accounts.

    I think it was Danny who mentioned bank accounts checks and stuff.

    No need to apologise for this, by the way.

  • Passerby
    Passerby Online Community Member Posts: 878 Championing

    Where's my comment to Socrates63, which I've just posted?

    I don't have time to waste typing comments that don't get posted!

    I didn't use any bad language or anything that can be prone to be censured!

    Any explanation?

  • JasonRA
    JasonRA Online Community Member Posts: 302 Championing

    So Telegraph (I really don't look for their articles, a terrible paper) were running with Pat McFadden replacing Liz Kendall with plans for another benefits clampdown. I mean I thought all of this was done with.

    Expect more Labour infighting, more rebellions and that was maybe why MP's like Maskell lost the whip so they will start again sans rebels.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    I emailed racheal maskell after she lost the whip now bearing in mind I'd previously emailed her 4 times before and she always replied but she never replied after she lost the whip

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    They left a gap between uc and pip they have it all planned out i dont think there will be as much pushbacks this time hes put fear into most mps

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 7,596 Championing

    Ps also the people on panel for pip cuts had to sign gagging clause so no information gets leaked