1990 — The Year My Body Broke and My Life Changed

Wibbles
Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing

I don’t remember the exact moment I collapsed on the night of 24 May 1990. What I remember is the feeling that had been building all day — a kind of internal trembling, as if something inside me was loosening, slipping, preparing to give way. I was twenty‑six, trying to keep up with the demands placed on me: the Civil Service alcohol policy, the treatment programme at RN Hospital, the pressure to stay sober on Antabuse. I was frightened, and I was trying to hold together a life that was already fraying at the edges.

Three months earlier, I had completed the mandatory alcohol awareness course at the RN Hospital. I was the only civilian among thirty naval staff. The Surgeon Commander prescribed me Antabuse, and I took it because I thought that was what responsible people did — they followed instructions, they complied, they didn’t make trouble. I didn’t understand the drug. I didn’t understand what it could do. I didn’t understand how violently it reacts with alcohol. I only knew I was trying to follow the rules.

Antabuse didn’t just sit quietly in my system. It blocked the breakdown of acetaldehyde — a toxic by‑product of alcohol — causing it to build up rapidly in the bloodstream. Even small amounts of alcohol could trigger flushing, palpitations, vomiting, collapse, and in severe cases, respiratory failure. I didn’t know any of this. Nobody seemed to. I was young, scared, and trying to stay afloat in a system that didn’t explain itself.

The First Collapse — 25 May 1990

At some point that night, my body finally said what I couldn’t. I collapsed outside my front door. I don’t remember hitting the ground. I don’t remember the fitting. I don’t remember the head injury. But the hospital notes later recorded “withdrawal – fitted + banged head” .

When I arrived at A&E, my vital signs were already telling a story of crisis:

  • Pulse 183
  • Blood pressure 140/90
  • Respiratory rate unstable

My arterial blood gases painted an even clearer picture:

“PcO₂ 6.25, H⁺ 52.2, PO₂ 22.83, Standard Bicarbonate 20.4, Base Excess -4.9, O₂ sat 99.1%”

These numbers meant:

  • PCO₂ 6.25 kPa → high, showing respiratory compromise
  • H⁺ 52.2 nmol/L → acidotic
  • PO₂ 22.83 kPa → extremely high due to oxygen therapy
  • HCO₃⁻ 20.4 mmol/L → low
  • Base Excess -4.9 → metabolic acidosis

My blood chemistry was equally alarming:

“Urea 14.1, Creatinine 266, Potassium 5.2, Sodium 135”

The creatinine of 266 µmol/L showed acute kidney stress. The urea of 14.1 mmol/L showed dehydration. I had fractured the base of my skull.

They discharged me, but I wasn’t well. My brain had taken a blow. My electrolytes were unstable. My nervous system was under strain. I went home to a house that was becoming increasingly chaotic — a reflection of my own deterioration.

The Slow Decline — Late May to June

The days that followed were a blur of falling, vomiting, dehydration, and confusion. My blood tests showed how unstable I was becoming.

On 26 May, my electrolytes collapsed:

“Potassium 2.1, Sodium 126, CO₂ 33.8, Urea 14.2, Creatinine 139”

A potassium level of 2.1 mmol/L is life‑threatening. Sodium at 126 mmol/L meant hyponatraemia. CO₂ at 33.8 mmol/L meant metabolic alkalosis.

My blood gases that day were even worse:

“PCO₂ 6.23, PO₂ 35.83, HCO₃⁻ 44.3, Base Excess 19.8, O₂ sat 99.8%”

This was severe metabolic alkalosis, the kind that causes confusion, seizures, and collapse.

By 28 May, my potassium was still critically low at 2.2 mmol/L.

I was living alone, deteriorating, and trying to survive. I didn’t know Antabuse was still active. I didn’t know my liver hadn’t recovered. I didn’t know my nervous system was under strain. I only knew I was slipping further away from myself.

The Second Collapse — 24–25 June 1990

By late June, I was barely functioning.

On 24 June, I was found unconscious and uncountable. The hospital record states:

“admitted … unconscious uncountable”

My blood gases showed metabolic alkalosis again — the same pattern that had been building for weeks.

On 28 June, my CO₂ was 32.9 mmol/L, potassium 3.7, sodium 140, albumin 35, calcium 2.20 .

I wasn’t speaking. I wasn’t responding. I was slipping away again.

Catastrophe — 25 June 1990

The next morning, everything collapsed.

I became unconscious and unrousable. I was fitting intermittently. I was incontinent. I couldn’t maintain my airway. I was dying, though I didn’t know it.

The blood gases from this period show catastrophic instability:

“H⁺ 7.1” (28 June)

This value is physiologically impossible in a living person — it reflects severe metabolic collapse, the kind seen in respiratory failure.

During that collapse, the oxygen supply to my brain failed. The damage was done quietly, invisibly, deep inside the basal ganglia — specifically the globus pallidus. This part of the brain is extremely sensitive to oxygen deprivation. It controls movement, balance, initiation, coordination, and motor planning.

I didn’t feel it happen. I didn’t know it had happened. But that moment changed the rest of my life.

Waking Up — Late June 1990

I woke up two days later after rehydration and potassium replacement. My blood chemistry on 29 June showed partial recovery:

“Urea 3.7, Creatinine 63, CO₂ 28.5, Potassium 3.9, Sodium 137, Albumin 35, Calcium 2.13”

But I didn’t feel recovered. I felt slow, heavy, foggy — as if something inside me had been switched off.

On 2 July, my potassium was 5.0, sodium 139, protein 40, albumin 40 — stable numbers, but I was not stable inside.

The July Aftermath

They transferred me back to the second Hospital on 3 July. I couldn’t walk properly. My movements were stiff. My reactions were slow. My face felt frozen. My voice felt flat.

No one recognised the basal ganglia injury.

My symptoms were misinterpreted as behavioural rather than neurological. I was told to sort out my house. I was told to attend appointments. I was told to comply. I tried. I couldn’t. My brain wasn’t working the way it used to.

On 24 July, they discharged me in my absence.

I left the hospital with a body that felt unfamiliar and a mind that felt foggy. I left with a future I didn’t understand. I left with a brain injury no one had diagnosed yet. I left with the weight of a month that had changed everything.

July was the beginning of the aftermath — the beginning of trying to live with a condition I didn’t know I had, caused by a collapse I couldn’t remember, triggered by a treatment I didn’t understand.

It was the beginning of the rest of my life.

Comments

  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing

    Sorry Wibbles, but how can you sue the MOD in this case ? My GP was at pains to stress that I should never drink once I started the course of medicine.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing

    Why you may have grounds to sue the MOD (short version)

    • Duty of care: The MOD owed you a legal duty to keep you safe at work.
    • Drug exposure: You were required or pressured to take Antabuse (disulfiram) as part of employment‑related alcohol management.
    • Foreseeable harm: Disulfiram is a drug with known severe toxic reactions.
    • No medical supervision: Your hospital records show no documentation of Antabuse, no toxicology, and no monitoring.
    • Causation: Your collapse caused respiratory failure, severe acidosis, and bilateral globus pallidus lesions — injuries consistent with toxic/metabolic collapse, not alcohol.
    • Permanent disability: You suffered lifelong neurological damage and loss of career.
    • Legal basis: If an employer exposes you to a dangerous drug without proper medical oversight, and you suffer foreseeable harm, that is potential negligence.

    Short legal statement:
    You may have grounds to sue the MOD because they exposed you to a dangerous drug without adequate medical supervision, leading to a foreseeable toxic injury and permanent disability.

    Why you may have grounds to sue the NHS (short version)

    • Duty of care: The NHS must diagnose and treat patients safely.
    • Misdiagnosis: Your 1990 collapse was recorded as “withdrawal – fitted + banged head”, with no mention of Antabuse.
    • Failure to identify drug reaction: A disulfiram–ethanol reaction is a medical emergency, yet it was not recognised.
    • Incorrect causation for decades: Your injury was repeatedly described as “alcohol‑related”, despite ABG results proving toxic/metabolic collapse.
    • Failure to investigate: No toxicology, no drug history, no metabolic follow‑up.
    • Long‑term harm: Misdiagnosis affected your employment, pension, IIDB, and medical care for 36 years.
    • Legal basis: Failure to diagnose a toxic reaction and failure to investigate the true cause of neurological injury may constitute clinical negligence.

    Short legal statement:
    You may have grounds to sue the NHS because they failed to identify your toxic drug reaction, misdiagnosed your injury, and caused long‑term harm through incorrect medical records.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing

    I am not legally responsible for the accident because the MOD created the risk by directing the use of Antabuse without adequate medical supervision, and the NHS failed to diagnose and treat the toxic reaction. My awareness of the drug’s risks does not transfer liability, especially as I was medically incapacitated during the event and did not control the medication, its supervision, or the clinical response. The injury resulted from a drug‑induced toxic/metabolic collapse, not from voluntary behaviour, and foreseeable harm must be prevented by the parties with the duty of care — the MOD and NHS, not me.

  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing

    But you drank alcohol whilst taking a drug designed to make you wish you hadn't?

    I've met people at a local alcohol group (Not AA) who became almost immune to antabuse, and could drink even whilst taking it. There are also those that were hospitalised for doing so, and sadly people who have had the most extreme reaction.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing
    edited July 22

    Statement: Why I Am Not Responsible for the Accident

    I acknowledge that I was aware alcohol and Antabuse (disulfiram) should not be taken together. However, this awareness does not make me legally or medically responsible for the toxic/metabolic collapse that occurred. Responsibility lies with the organisations that created, supervised, and medically managed the risk. My later diagnosis of Parkinsonism, which is recognised as a potential long‑term consequence of basal ganglia injury, further demonstrates the severity and permanence of the harm caused by the original toxic event.

    1. The MOD created and controlled the risk

    Antabuse was taken under MOD direction or pressure as part of workplace‑related alcohol management.
    I did not prescribe, authorise, medically assess, or supervise the medication.
    The MOD had the legal duty to ensure safe administration, proper medical oversight, and prevention of foreseeable harm.
    An employee cannot be held liable for a risk created and controlled by the employer.

    2. Knowledge of a risk does not transfer legal responsibility

    In UK negligence law, awareness of a risk does not make a person liable when the employer created the dangerous situation and held the duty of care.
    Responsibility remains with the party who had the authority and obligation to manage the risk — in this case, the MOD.

    3. The NHS failed to diagnose and treat the toxic reaction

    During the collapse, I was unconscious and critically ill.
    I could not explain the drug, correct the diagnosis, or influence treatment.
    The NHS had the duty to take a proper medical history, identify Antabuse exposure, recognise a toxic/metabolic reaction, and treat appropriately.
    Their misdiagnosis and failure to investigate causation are not my responsibility.

    4. I was medically incapacitated during the event

    The collapse involved respiratory failure, severe acidosis, and loss of consciousness.
    A person in this condition cannot be held responsible for events occurring around them.
    UK law does not assign liability to someone who is incapacitated during a medical emergency.

    5. The injury was caused by a drug‑induced toxic reaction

    The collapse was caused by disulfiram toxicity and metabolic failure, resulting in hypoxia and bilateral globus pallidus injury.
    These are biochemical medical events, not voluntary behaviour.
    I did not cause the toxic reaction; the drug did.

    6. My later diagnosis of Parkinsonism demonstrates long‑term neurological harm

    I have since been diagnosed with Parkinsonism, a condition that can arise from injury to the basal ganglia.
    This diagnosis supports the fact that the original toxic/metabolic collapse caused permanent neurological damage.
    The progression of this condition is a consequence of the injury, not of any personal behaviour.

    7. Foreseeable harm must be prevented by the party with the duty of care

    The MOD and NHS had the legal responsibility to prevent foreseeable harm.
    I did not have medical authority, clinical training, supervisory responsibility, or control over the medication or workplace environment.
    Therefore, liability does not fall on me.

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing
  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing
    edited July 23

    My wife really doesn't want me to put in my claim……..Why ?

    Because according to her - we have enough money already and won't know what to spend it on…..

    if I do get 100% - it will be worth £2,700 per month tax free backdated 36 years !

  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing
    edited July 23

    And maybe she is right? There's no pockets in a shroud after all.

    If I was given a million pounds, I would just be some wealthy guy with Muscular Dystrophy, but what would change, apart from my bank balance?

  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing
    edited July 23

    Are you even allowed to disagree with her @SwiftFox?

    I now have a mental picture of Ivy coming out of the Café kitchen to put Sid firmly in his place! 😁

  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing
  • ChrisR777
    ChrisR777 Community Member Posts: 1,890 Championing

    It was mostly because we hated each other. If I live to be 100 yo, i'll never know how we ended up getting married in the first place. 🙄

  • egiste2r
    egiste2r Posts: 193 Connected

    She doesn't remember, she comes up with something that benefits her every time.

    😁

  • Wibbles
    Wibbles Community Member Posts: 3,726 Championing

    Mines the same - she brings up the things that happened over 1/4 century ago - things that I could do absolutely nothing about now and had forgotten about - only not just once, literally hundreds of times !