If this is your first visit, check out the community guide. You will have to Join us or Sign in before you can post.
Receiving too many notifications? Adjust your notification settings.
Social Housing Bungalows - not eligible as under 55

Hi,
I've just applied for social housing as I'm struggling in our current house due to mobility issues. I applied for a bungalow, but have been told I can't apply for any of the vacant ones because I am not over 55 - surely that can't be allowed?
There are only two properties showing as eligible for me, both flats, neither are accessible or in the town I live in - the nearest if 18 miles away, I also won't move into a flat as there's no way our dog would settle if someone was upstairs making a noise.
Unfortunately there's no council housing, as all stock was transferred to a housing association in the 90s and a private bungalow would be £300pm more than we can get on Housing Benefit.
I'm not sure what else we can do, so any advice is welcome.
I'm not sure what else we can do, so any advice is welcome.
Tagged:
Replies
The rules about disabled housing are first and most wrong because nothing, nothing at all, should be allowed past planning consent as new build housing, unless it can be occupied for the lifetime of the building by people at all times of their lives, importantly, including when they have someone in the household who is disabled.
Only by turning on a supply of the almost non existent national disabled-friendly housing stock will you or anyone begin to have the reasonable selection of housing others take for granted.
@newborn not sure I understand how you thought your post was helping anybody?
I live in housing association bungalow since I was 50 due to becoming wheelchair bound
I suggest you self refer for a care needs assessment on the Gov website
A OT will come and assess you and if they feel appropriate will recommend aids or need for suitable type housing
The report can then be sent to local housing and may allow you to then bid on bungalows if that is what is recommended
They may suggest adaptions to your current home
I did try calling Social Services but haven't managed to get through yet, and no replies to emails.
I'd rather crawl up and down stairs or go to the toilet in a bucket than give the dog away.
I just can't see why age discrimination is allowed, especially when it comes to accessible housing.
I have 3 cats who are like my children, so I understand how much you love your dog and how much he/she adds to your quality of life. You need a home that meets all your needs and suitability for both your impairment and pet isn't too much to ask for in my opinion.
Also, on the bigger picture @newborn makes a valid point in there being a clear lack of accessible housing, designed with all age ranges and body types in mind. I hope it's not too distant a reality for these considerations to be mandatory in the planning stages of house building.
Good luck with your neuro-rehab appointment and please keep us updated with how you get on
Want to tell us about your experience on the community? Talk to our chatbot and let us know.
A person with a disabled- useable home will not necessarily need to go into a care home or institution, and will frequently need far less carer visits, because they can move freely all round their home. A home ready for a disabled person will easily have hoist tracks fitted, so people will not need to remain in hospital. It won't have doors too small to let furniture me moved in, or stretchers be moved out. It will have as standard the type of loo which is standard in Japan, and which allows anyone with limited movement and strength, but still the ability to sit on the pan, to have independence and dignity because the loo itself does a wash and dry.
We the occupants, and the future generations who occupy the housing, are set in direct opposition to the lobbying developers, who would only need to spend a comparatively minor amount extra, if disability is planned in from the outset, but who begrudge every penny of profit. Against that, all that we, the general public have is numbers. Young and old, fit and frail, all of us, in our millions. It doesn't matter if we are paying mortgage or rent, we want a roof over our head. It doesn't matter if we are 100% athletic, and so is everyone who ever lives with us or ever visits us. Sooner or later, the building we live in will need to be usable by a person with reduced mobility.
Everyone who doesn't die young gets old. Everyone who thinks they are safely fit and athletic today is only one accident away from short term or permanent injury. Everyone in the world is either disabled or a T.A.B. (Temporarily Able Bodied) So what do we do? Sit grumbling and let the lobbying developers construct Grenfells, that's what. Sit competing against others in equal or greater need, for the tiny number of accessible units of housing, that's what.
One of the Scope mods put a notice on this board drawing attention to a government public consultation on exactly this topic. Nobody took any interest.
(Councils had obviously protested they couldn't cover social service demand, caused mainly because there is simply nowhere for disabled people to live without needing constant visits, because they cannot get in and out of their bedrooms, kitchens, bathrooms unaided and without being able to turn a wheelchair or get up and down stairs. At last, they were wondering if somebody ought to think about the occupants of housing, who don't lobby local and central government to permit the lowest standards of building. But even Scope readers couldn't be bothered to accept the invitation to change things.)
( "To those who have not, shall be taken away the little they have".}
Want to tell us about your experience on the community? Talk to our chatbot here and let us know what you think
The need for accessible and liveable housing is not one ever before put forward. Nor does anyone seem to care. The Scope team did. They posted the government public consultation. Few people showed a flicker of interest. I doubt if more than half a dozen of the public will have bothered to fill in the question
Want to tell us about your experience on the community? Talk to our chatbot and let us know.
As suggested maybe start your own post which I think you have done before on this subject
They aren't reserved for disabled elderly, they are reserved for over 55+ (I'd hardly call 55 elderly!), and most do accept pets.
What I was bothering me was that there's a mimimum age limit and that this is seen as perfectly fine legally, which means under 55 disabled people are pretty much limited to flats, and we have a dog that would bark non stop if there was noise from upstairs (but not from next door).
There is a massive shortage of accessible properties, but I don't agree with restricting them by age, especially when anyone over 55 without need of an accessible property can apply for them (there's no requirement to have health or mobility issues or a disablility, you just have to be 55 or over).
There are so many elderly or disabled people needing this sort of housing how can it be right
They could live in any type of housing . It's not their fault they were allocated it but just shows the system is all wrong
In terms of buying i dont think bungalows are being built that much any more which is a real shame
Want to tell us about your experience on the community? Talk to our chatbot and let us know.
My bungalow wouldn't be suitable for everyone due to the size, the bathroom is so small the door can't be fully opened as the toilet is behind it and there's no room for a bath just a shower, the kitchen is tiny too like a corridor, one of the doors can't be fully opened because of the kitchen unit behind it.
I think I probably got a bungalow as there isn't a great demand for them where I live whereas there is a big demand for family houses which is where I lived previously owned by the same housing association.
You mentioned that you are allowed to keep cats and dogs, so do you? I'm curious
Want to tell us about your experience on the community? Talk to our chatbot and let us know.