Hi, I'm Jacqueline_Rose! Is it standard practice for DM's to offer awards before tribunal?
Options
Jacqueline_Rose
Community member Posts: 4 Listener
Prior to my son's tribunal, someone from the DWP a <moderator removed name> called to say that the DWP had looked at the claim and decided to award Dylan PIP at the standard rate. He emphasised that he was the decision maker and he had conceded that my son (who has early onset psychosis and applied for PIP over 3 years ago) scored sufficient points to be awarded the standard rate.
I questioned how he had come to that decision when his OT, Consultant Psychiatrist, Private Psychotherapist and GP had stated in a report that he should be awarded the enhanced rate. He said that if we agreed he would put the money in our account the next day. His approach was initially quite brusque, and at one point I had to ask him to stop shouting.
The nature of the whole call was highly inappropriate. It felt like he was 'doorstepping' us. It was as if it was a private claim and he was offering to settle out of court. The experience was unnerving and I told him, we would rather take let the judge decide. I'm so glad we made that decision as my son was awarded the enhanced rate.
I feel calling just before the hearing could be deemed as intimidation (although <moderator removed name> was not threatening), as some people would be very worried about appearing in court (pre-Covid) and for that reason may have accepted the DWP's offer as an easy option.
Is this normal practice on the part of the DWP to treat sick people in this way and to essentially put them in a position where they could potentially lose out on money which is, not only rightly theirs, but for which they have already waited so long for? I am appalled to know that this practice is condoned by the Government. Please can you keep this email as a record and add it to any Social Change Activity you may have.
Comments
-
Prior to my son's tribunal, someone from the DWP a <moderator removed name> called to say that the DWP had looked at the claim and decided to award Dylan PIP at the standard rate. He emphasised that he was the decision maker and he had conceded that my son (who has early onset psychosis and applied for PIP over 3 years ago) scored sufficient points to be awarded the standard rate.
I questioned how he had come to that decision when his OT, Consultant Psychiatrist, Private Psychotherapist and GP had stated in a report that he should be awarded the enhanced rate. He said that if we agreed he would put the money in our account the next day. His approach was initially quite brusque, and at one point I had to ask him to stop shouting.The nature of the whole call was highly inappropriate. It felt like he was 'doorstepping' us. It was as if it was a private claim and he was offering to settle out of court. The experience was unnerving and I told him, we would rather take let the judge decide. I'm so glad we made that decision as my son was awarded the enhanced rate.I feel calling just before the hearing could be deemed as intimidation (although <moderator removed name> was not threatening), as some people would be very worried about appearing in court (pre-Covid) and for that reason may have accepted the DWP's offer as an easy option.Is this normal practice on the part of the DWP to treat sick people in this way and to essentially put them in a position where they could potentially lose out on money which is, not only rightly theirs, but for which they have already waited so long for? I am appalled to know that this practice is condoned by the Government. Please can you keep this email as a record and add it to any Social Change Activity you may have. -
Jacqueline_Rose said: Is this normal practice on the part of the DWP to treat sick people in this way and to essentially put them in a position where they could potentially lose out on money which is, not only rightly theirs, but for which they have already waited so long for? I am appalled to know that this practice is condoned by the Government. Please can you keep this email as a record and add it to any Social Change Activity you may have.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Rules may be different in other parts of UK.
-
Hello @Jacqueline_Rose and welcome to our community.
I've merged your posts to keep everything in one place and have also edited out the name of the decision maker for confidentiality reasons.
I have heard of this happening before and you can read about it in this CPAG 'An offer you can't refuse' article and in this Guardian article by Dr. Frances Ryan. I believe it isn't a universal practice however and am glad to hear your son went onto receive the enhanced rate.
Thank you for sharing and I'd be interested in hearing others opinions.
Online Community Co-ordinator
Want to tell us about your experience on the online community? Talk to our chatbot and let us know.Concerned about another member's safety or wellbeing? Flag your concerns with us. -
I think it's about thinking of lesser empowered people and perhaps those who lack information. We are all in this position either because at this moment in time our health is not at its best, either mentally or physically. Or we in someway lack the ability to go about our daily lives in a way in which most people are expected to; Or even if, as in my case, we are caring for someone in those positions, that too takes its toll on your health.
So it's all very well saying you can accept and then go on to appeal again, but the process of appealing is very stressful, and to some degree demeaning, and when you are already dealing with the affects your illness has on daily living, quite inhumane.
I disagree when you say you can't really lose. The process itself means that sadly we are already losing by the time it comes to a hearing. I appreciate your comment though. Thank you. -
I'm sorry I do not see it your way and would refer you to the 2 articles presented by the online Co-ordinator above. The whole process needs a revamp in my opinion. But as always, I appreciate your response.
-
Jacqueline_Rose said:I'm sorry I do not see it your way and would refer you to the 2 articles presented by the online Co-ordinator above. The whole process needs a revamp in my opinion. But as always, I appreciate your response.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Rules may be different in other parts of UK.
Brightness
Categories
- All Categories
- 13K Start here and say hello!
- 6.6K Coffee lounge
- 104 Games lounge
- 416 Cost of living
- 4.3K Disability rights and campaigning
- 1.9K Research and opportunities
- 199 Community updates
- 9.3K Talk about your situation
- 2.1K Children, parents, and families
- 1.6K Work and employment
- 776 Education
- 1.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.4K Aids, adaptations, and equipment
- 615 Dating, sex, and relationships
- 363 Exercise and accessible facilities
- 737 Transport and travel
- 31.5K Talk about money
- 4.3K Benefits and financial support
- 5.2K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 17.1K PIP, DLA, and AA
- 4.9K Universal Credit (UC)
- 6.3K Talk about your impairment
- 1.8K Cerebral palsy
- 868 Chronic pain and pain management
- 180 Physical and neurological impairments
- 1.1K Autism and neurodiversity
- 1.2K Mental health and wellbeing
- 319 Sensory impairments
- 824 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
Do you need advice on your energy costs?
Scope’s Disability Energy Support service is open to any disabled household in England or Wales in which one or more disabled people live. You can get free advice from an expert adviser on managing energy debt, switching tariffs, contacting your supplier and more. Find out more information by visiting our
Disability Energy Support webpage.