"Sickness handouts to be cut for mentally ill" under Labour proposal- The Telegraph

245

Comments

  • Meg24
    Meg24 Online Community Member Posts: 390 Trailblazing

    I'm aware. I get LCWRA currently under the substantial risk rule. As I have always avoided diagnosis & never been psychotic I am on the front line for losing it if they press ahead.

    My PIP award reflects my true difficulties, I am also worried I might lose that too. I'm sure I will not be the only casualty of this drive to sweep our disabilities under the rug and pretend we're all faking it.

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    I have to disagree with you on that one @Nightcity because I believe you can have mild and severe mental health.


    However I do agree that sick pay and reducing it it's ridiculous. However loads of people are taking it because they think it's a way to get out off work and putting it down to stress and anxiety. Now don't get me wrong most of the population like us are not one of them but there's more and more people in the world that are taking advantage of sick pay. Oh the other hand some employers aren't treating there staff properly so they are taking sick pay because they are just fed up with it all.


    I'm going to put this to the assembly and see what they think.

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    Hi I have had contact with some of the assembly members on this issue and we don't think that sounds right so my tip is to check the correct source.

    Says physical and mental health issues are both eligible for sick pay

    https://www.acas.org.uk/checking-sick-pay#:~:text=If%20someone%20is%20off%20sick,issues%20can%20count%20as%20sickness

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    Apparently the new Workers' Rights Bill will "bolster people’s sick pay, maternity leave and protection against unfair dismissal"

    More info on the bill here: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/what-does-the-employment-rights-bill-mean-for-you

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    Says the bill will:

    Give protection against unfair dismissal from day one, while allowing employers to operate probation periods

    Establish parental and bereavement leave from day one

    End exploitative zero hour contracts

    End unscrupulous practices of fire and rehire and fire and replace

    Make flexible working the norm where practical

    Deliver stronger dismissal protections for pregnant women and new mothers

    Establish a new Fair Work Agency with new powers to enforce holiday pay

    Strengthen statutory sick pay

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    Also:

    Sick pay

    The waiting period and lower earnings limit to receive Statutory Sick Pay will be removed.

    Currently, to qualify for sick pay, you must have been ill for more than three days in a row and earn an average of at least £123 per week.

    Under the plans, employees will be entitled to Statutory Sick Pay from the first day they are ill and those earning under £123 per week will also be eligible for it.

    You can get £116.75 per week Statutory Sick Pay if you’re too ill to work and it is paid by your employer for up to 28 weeks. Some can get more if their company has a sick pay scheme.

  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,456 Championing

    @durhamjaide2001 I think you maybe confused here. This thread is about sickness benefits, such as ESA and UC that includes LCWRA element. It's not about employment rights or SSP.

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    it's here when you are saying that there's no such thing as servier mental health.

  • Jimm_Alumni
    Jimm_Alumni Scope alumni Posts: 5,713 Championing
    edited October 2024

    I think there may have been some miscommunication there Jaide. @Nightcity is not suggesting that mental health cannot be mild. They are just talking about how many people will just dismiss it as mild or not existing even when it is very severe. I share that frustration, having come across it myself in life as well.

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    I meant milf mental health I'm sorry I often say the one word but I meant mild I hate it when it happens I believe you can have mild mental health because most people suffer from anxiety and depression but they don't have to go to the doctor about it and I would class that as mild.

  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,456 Championing

    Just because someone may not see a GP that is no indication that their mental health is mild!

  • Jimm_Alumni
    Jimm_Alumni Scope alumni Posts: 5,713 Championing
    edited October 2024

    Miscommunication and misunderstanding are okay, it happens when we discuss things.

  • Doglover2
    Doglover2 Online Community Member Posts: 441 Empowering

    When you suffer and I mean suffer from mixed anxiety and depression with severe panic attacks on top decades, with other physical health conditions, also decades and lifelong, when each assessment for Instance floors you,when you are choked by anxiety,rarely leave the house and never alone ,When, just when is your MH considered severe??? I'd love to know.

    It's only "mild" if you've no clue to the depth it drives us.

  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing
  • durhamjaide2001
    durhamjaide2001 Scope Member Posts: 15,455 Championing

    that was just an example on how mental health could be mild

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Online Community Member Posts: 9,796 Championing

    The worry is if they tighten the criteria for WCA

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Online Community Member Posts: 9,796 Championing
  • egister
    egister Posts: 1,110 Pioneering

    That's right, rumors are a provocation on the part of the authorities, they also show their intentions and their real face. It's stupid to ignore them. As well as trust them completely.

    If this is so, then the “carpet bombing” proposed in the topic will only worsen the situation for everyone. First, it is necessary to develop scientific criteria for diagnosis and selection, train doctors, and only then recheck the recipients of payments. The government has no money - let it cut costs in other places, but not at the expense of suffering disabled people and pensioners. We should not forget that they were the ones who built the country when they could work.

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Online Community Member Posts: 9,796 Championing

    Do you think thier holding back on what plans for pip are till after local elections?? So we still vote labour in am I making sense

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Online Community Member Posts: 9,796 Championing

    I'm under substantial risk rule why would we lose it ?