Home improvements and VAT
Comments
-
-
rebel11 said:So - just because a non-disabled person is also able to make use of a kitchen extension - they deny VAT reliefStrangely - I had a council surveyor out a couple of months ago who told me that if the kitchen had a drop down keysafe on the wall - that made the whole structure eligible for VAT relief !0
-
It's all 'bizarre', you could make several arguments, they will no doubt make other arguments. My mum 'shrank' as you do with age / conditions, so could no longer reach the worktop, so would need a worktop lowered, so standard kitchen units would need to be lowered, which you can do with standard kitchen units, but the plinth would also be smaller in height. They would argue that normal people can use the kitchen as it's not specifically designed for her conditions.0
-
The thing is that in order for us to create a new downstairs toilet (which CLEARLY IS VAT free) we need to create a new kitchen...
The new toilet will have to go where the existing kitchen is now0 -
From memory HMRC has a helpline regards VAT, you could run it pass them to see if your situation qualifies.0
-
Evidently - I was correct in my assumption that HMRC are arses - They believe that I am entitled to vat free toilet facilities but not kitchen - although the toilet is going where the existing kitchen is.....with a new kitchen in an extensionThey claim that ANYONE could use the kitchen so is not vat free - so I asked whether anyone could use the toilet - their response "Sorry - these are the rules"So its going to cost me an extra £10k!0
-
I have asked HMRC !
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/53/section/23 classes access to a kitchen as being vital for disabled persons
“facilitating the preparation and cooking of food by the disabled occupant” for the purposes of a disabled facilities grant.
At the moment – due to the size of my present kitchen – access is NOT possible by wheelchair
"Disabled people may qualify for disabled facilities grants towards the cost of providing adaptations and facilities in their private residence to enable them to continue living there. Such grants are given by local councils under Part I of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. The council may pay the grant:
- direct to the disabled person; or
- direct to the contractor.
If the grant is paid to the contractor you should check the contractor’s records to ensure that:
- the invoice clearly stated that the work was done for the disabled person; and
- VAT was not charged on zero-rated work."
But according to HMRC's previous reply – a kitchen is classed as NON zero-rated.
Could someone please explain why a Kitchen is rated as NON zero rated when a private individual wants to pay for their own home improvement/extension ?
But zero-rated when an individual is in receipt of a disabled facilities grant – in fact – HMRC rules state to check with the contractor that VAT was NOT charged on the work !!
I am not entitled to a means tested grant – due to having savings of over £16k
0 -
Has anybody ever found a solution to this problem ?ie VAT on vital disabled friendly home improvements, when self funded - but not when covered by a grant ?0
-
Nice article0
-
I am still unable to get a definitive reason from HMRC0
-
I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.
0 -
OverlyAnxious said:I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.0 -
Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.0 -
OverlyAnxious said:Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.
It is a normal toilet0 -
Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.
It is a normal toilet
Although anyone could use it, the main purpose of it is accessibility for yourself. There will still be another toilet in the property for everyone else to use.
0 -
There are cases where people have appealed the HMRC decision not to allow a VAT refund.
That's archived on the HMRC / Gov website. Might be worth looking on their for a definitive answer.2 -
OverlyAnxious said:Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:Wibbles said:OverlyAnxious said:I would have thought the reason was simply that the grant comes out of taxes. So it wouldn't make sense for them to have to pay VAT which is just paying themselves in a loop.
The idea is that if you can afford to pay for the work (so not eligible for the grant) then you would be expected to pay VAT the same as everyone else.
I don't have any confirmation of that, just my own understanding.
It is a normal toilet
Although anyone could use it, the main purpose of it is accessibility for yourself. There will still be another toilet in the property for everyone else to use.0 -
rebel11 said:There are cases where people have appealed the HMRC decision not to allow a VAT refund.
That's archived on the HMRC / Gov website. Might be worth looking on their for a definitive answer.0 -
Here are the plans for our long awaited downstairs bathroomAny comments ?0
-
Is it just a toilet or a bathroom as well? If it's a bathroom, is this being moved from upstairs to downstairs?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.3K Start here and say hello!
- 6.8K Coffee lounge
- 70 Games den
- 1.6K People power
- 102 Community noticeboard
- 22.1K Talk about life
- 5.1K Everyday life
- 66 Current affairs
- 2.2K Families and carers
- 828 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 444 Money and bills
- 3.4K Housing and independent living
- 899 Transport and travel
- 660 Relationships
- 64 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.3K Talk about your impairment
- 846 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 894 Neurological impairments and pain
- 1.9K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 35.9K Talk about your benefits
- 5.6K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 18.5K PIP, DLA, and AA
- 6.6K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.1K Benefits and income