MR - how did you present it?

Lottie1732

I've started a word table where I quote what the decision maker says and in the next column I explain what the reality is.  I'm planning to refute most of what they said in the whole glorious nonsense, 5 page letter. There is some cutting and pasting going on. I can spot it a mile off. 

Is that the way to go?  Point by point? 

What a flawed system. They don't know me or what I do or don't do. How can two strangers, talking on the phone learn anything. One who cares desperately because their future is in the balance and one who cares not a jot and who's underlying remit is to refuse. My telephone assessor was quite spikey and was as unfriendly as a VAT inspector. 

Anyway, on we go

Have a great Easter bank hols everyone. Let the PIP and all that stuff go for a couple of days. 

Lottie. 

poppy123456

You shouldn't concentrate wholly on the report or the decision letter because this isn't going to get you a PIP award. It's fine to point out a couple of obvious errors but then put both of them to one side and forget about them. If it gets to Tribunal they already know that some reports are flawed.

For the MR you should state where and why you think you should have scored those points. Include a couple of real world incidents of exactly what happened the last time you attempted each descriptor that applies to you. Adding detailed information such as where you were, what exactly happened, did anyone see it and what the consequences were.

You should aim for at least half an A4 side of paper per descriptor that applies to you.