nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Had health report back, found LCWRA, but no mention of not coping with any change in a non-routine

Rumbler303

Hello,

I've had lots of help on this from this lovely community, but I noticed on my report that deemed me as LCWRA that it didn't mention that I'm not good with both planned & unplanned change that's not in a routine.

When looking at the UC50, it mentions specifically: routine. Can this descriptor still apply even if you find it hard to be in a routine due to ailments, but anything that is planned and then changed in-advance, you find it hard to cope e.g. due to ASD?

My understanding is yes but just wanted to clarify.

Thanks.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Rumbler303

Changed in-advance or on the spot, that is, even if it is not necessarily in a routine.

luvpink

https://forum.scope.org.uk/discussion/131275/had-health-report-back-found-lcwra-but-no-mention-of-not-coping-with-any-change-in-a-non-routine

It shouldn't make any difference as they have already awarded you

lcwra.

Rumbler303

I suppose that since 'any' seems to be pretty open-ended it can literally just be 'any' change? The other two descriptors do mention routine, but the LCWRA one doesn't.

durhamjaide2001

congratulations on being the first person to post today

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering