FIFA / Trump / Red card
What are we all thinking about this?
For those who don't know, red card in a match means an automatic suspension from the next game. One of America's top strikers got a red card and Trump called up the head of Fifa and Fifa have since announced they are allowing him to play the next match anyway
Comments
-
I think it's very naughty behaviour to even try that! And I'm not sure how FIFA can justify the decision.
1 -
If FIFA are going to do this for America the same should apply for every player in the world cup who gets a red card and they should be allowed to play the next match.
2 -
i think englands red card should be resinded, just because it can
1 -
Everyone hates us enough already 😂
1 -
They have suspended the punishment for 1 year, it hasn't been rescinded. Still ridiculous though!
What will the craven Infantino do if Trump demands the USA win the tournament? 🤔
1 -
The red card hasn't been rescinded, just suspended for one year. Trump doesn't even know what a red card is i bet, just has to upstage everyone. Disgraceful, I think it stinks.
1 -
Trump needs to touch grass and stay out of International "Soccer"
0 -
More reason for me to Boycott the world cup.
0 -
I think this is very sneaky and unfair! Surely if they let one player despite having a red card play, they should let other players who've been carded play?
0 -
I don't expect any less from Trump and ridiculous from FIFA … it screams corruption when they're trying to still get over Sepp Blatter and his many charms
I only saw a snippet of the original red card … seemed harsh, no intent, looking at the ball, just 2 players coming together
The Red Devils have put it to bed … just hope they don't end up in some CIA camp on trumped up charges 😋
0 -
I won't pretend to know a lot about this but isn't complaining about ref decisions just part of football? Even if the red was too harsh, it's ridiculous for a president to intervene in this way. He made a joke out of the US team and FIFA agreeing lost a lot of the trust people have in the game.
I think Belgium were probably a stronger team anyway but the US team lost so much support and faced a few days of bad feelings and criticism ahead of their game which would have impacted their performance.
0 -
With regards to penalties, calll them boiled eggs for a minute - A soft boiled egg, or a hard boiled egg, both are still boiled eggs.
A senior referee used that analogy once, when pundits were complaining about a 'soft' penalty.
0 -
We're all equal, but some are more equal than others. Pffff.
I can't help but think it is always about the powers that be. Why even play a game with certain rules? Why not put people out there in a field, no matter how many players on each side, no matter if they have a ball or two or a tennis racket and let them get on with it. First round 20 min, the next 35 for no apparent reason. Oh, let's add a third half at random where they sit down and check their bingo card.
0 -
Should never have been suspended and I think it's eroded a lot of goodwill that the US had earned as an enthusiastic host. They would have lost against Belgium either way, but that's a little different to being actively rooted against because there's now the stench of corruption lingering over your team.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 16.3K Start here and say hello!
- 7.7K Coffee lounge
- 120 Games den
- 1.8K People power
- 185 Announcements and information
- 25.7K Talk about life
- 6.2K Everyday life
- 424 Current affairs
- 2.5K Families and carers
- 889 Education and skills
- 2K Work
- 610 Money and bills
- 3.8K Housing and independent living
- 1.2K Transport and travel
- 675 Relationships
- 1.6K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.6K Talk about your impairment
- 883 Rare, invisible, & undiagnosed conditions
- 945 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2.3K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.3K Autism and neurodiversity
- 41.5K Talk about your benefits
- 6.2K Employment & Support Allowance (ESA)
- 20.5K PIP, DLA, ADP & AA
- 9.4K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.4K Benefits and income







