If this is your first visit, check out the community guide. You will have to Join us or Sign in before you can post.
Receiving too many notifications? Adjust your notification settings.
Evidence for PIP appeals

I have just been awarded standard rate both daily needs and getting around and have applied for mandatory reconsideration. My grounds are 1) that the Atos Assessor stated in her report that because I can turn a power steering wheel then it follows that I must be able to prepare food, cut it up and eat it, wash and bathe, and dress/undress all within a reasonable time period; and 2) that because I was able to walk 16 metres on a flat carpeted surface in the Atos Assessment Centre then it follows that I must also be able to walk more than 20 metres but less than 50 outside using uneven pavements and kerbs.
My challenge to 1) is that far more complex hand and body movements are required to undertake the various tasks than are required to turn a power steering wheel. Therefore, Atos/DWP have not applied the reliability criterion of being to complete tasks within a reasonable time. I have stated that on bad days I cannot chop and peel vegetables at all and that it takes me more than twice the time it would take a non-disabled person to complete the other tasks. However, there is only my evidence of this.
2) That the DWP's own Handbook states that walking ability should be assessed outside using pavements and kerbs.
If the mandatory reconsideration decision maker, or the tribunal if it gets that far, accept that Atos's assessment procedures were faulty, could I be asked to undergo a new assessment?
My challenge to 1) is that far more complex hand and body movements are required to undertake the various tasks than are required to turn a power steering wheel. Therefore, Atos/DWP have not applied the reliability criterion of being to complete tasks within a reasonable time. I have stated that on bad days I cannot chop and peel vegetables at all and that it takes me more than twice the time it would take a non-disabled person to complete the other tasks. However, there is only my evidence of this.
2) That the DWP's own Handbook states that walking ability should be assessed outside using pavements and kerbs.
If the mandatory reconsideration decision maker, or the tribunal if it gets that far, accept that Atos's assessment procedures were faulty, could I be asked to undergo a new assessment?
Replies
I don't know what will happen if the DWP do accept my rebuttals of the assessor's preposterous inferences. Apparently, few decisions are overturned at mandatory reconsideration stage. Have to wait and see.
The DWP have based their decision exclusively on the assessor's report, no account having been taken of my 'How your disability affects you' form or my diary! I think this is the case with all decisions. Assessors are supposed to be 'health professionals' but I gather that most have only rudimentary medical knowledge. My assessor was described as a 'paramedic', so with not much more knowledge than first aid. Yet, the DWP treat the opinions of these 'professionals' as infallible. No wonder 68% of appeals are successful.
Regards. . . .
And because of this wonderful invention the higher rate was denied .
It's a joke !
They believed the Assesor's Report
I,too,was on indefinite (high rate) DLA and was awarded standard rate on PIP for the mobility component.
I am currently waiting on a Mandatory Reconsideration, but I don't hold out much hope based on what experiences others have had.
I hope someone can come along and give you some advice.
Good luck with it all.