nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

Review in 2 years

poppy60

hi
on my report it says review in 2 years but I’ve not had a decision yet

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

markyboy

Sounds like yo have been awarded a 3 tear award with a review in 2 years Decision letter should follow

poppy123456

poppy60 said:

hi
on my report it says review in 2 years but I’ve not had a decision yet

Hi,

Did you add up the dots and ticks in the boxes? A review date recommendation doesn't mean there's enough points for an award. They have a strange way of doing things but i've often heard people say there's a review date and there recommendation for points scored isn't enough for an award.

poppy60

Sorry what do you mean by 3 tear award ?
sorry I’m not having a good day ?

poppy60

Just checked the dots and should get 14 for care and 12 for mobility

MRoalf

Sorry but what are you talking about dots, I don't understand.

poppy60

Was told to add up ticks and dots in the boxes which I’ve done

poppy123456

poppy60 said:

Sorry what do you mean by 3 tear award ?
sorry I’m not having a good day ?

I think that should have said year and not tear.

poppy123456

MRoalf said:

Sorry but what are you talking about dots, I don't understand.

In a PIP assessment report there's boxes with dots or ticks, these are the recommendations for the decision maker because they're recommendations only they aren't added up in the report. You have to use the PIP descriptors to added them and this will give you the score that's recommended. It's rare for the decision maker to go against the report.

Yadnad

So the length of the award actually starts with the assessor. Does the assessor have to justify the length suggested?
Is this advice given by the assessor a conflict of interest - the more assessments they get through the more money they make? It isn't really in their interest to advise long award periods.

Yadnad

Yadnad said:

So the length of the award actually starts with the assessor. Does the assessor have to justify the length suggested?
Is this advice given by the assessor a conflict of interest - the more assessments they get through the more money they make? It isn't really in their interest to advise long award periods.

I can't check mine as when they come in they get shredded.

poppy60

@markyboy
what do you mean by a 3 tier award please ?

poppy60

markyboy said:

Sounds like yo have been awarded a 3 tear award with a review in 2 years Decision letter should follow

poppy60

Type your commen

poppy123456

poppy60 said:

markyboy said:

Sounds like yo have been awarded a 3 tear award with a review in 2 years Decision letter should follow

Tear = year. Seems obvious it was a typo lol. These things can happen especially if using auto correct.

poppy60

@poppy123456 thankyou

Government_needs_reform

Yadnad said:

So the length of the award actually starts with the assessor. Does the assessor have to justify the length suggested?
Is this advice given by the assessor a conflict of interest - the more assessments they get through the more money they make? It isn't really in their interest to advise long award periods.

@yadnad it does indeed start, and come from the assessment assessor, and the DWP mostly will follow it. if you look at my report that will give a great example to me getting an ongoing award.

poppy60

@Government_needs_reform
thats what my MS nurse was expecting me to get

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering