We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
Firefly123 said: Yes we got asked the same questions at the home assessment.
Firefly123 said: I never got asked them questions about my daughter and am just waiting for the outcome of her paper based assessment.
I ended up receiving a phone call from the Independent Assessment Service’s, after I had phoned the DWP and raised the above concerns / complaints in my original post. She introduced herself, as a customer care manager (I think, I just remember her being a manager) and wanted to address the concerns that I had with the assessment and the new upcoming face-to-face assessment.
She informed me, the Health Professional after speaking to my nominated medical professional (Psychiatric Nurse) felt the answers given (although I was told, that the health professional refused to speak to the Psychiatric Nurse) were not detailed enough for her to fully complete a paper based assessment, and informed my Psychiatric Nurse that it would be going back for review by the Independent Assessment Service to be put forward as a face-to-face consultation being required. She explained that, when this was communicated by the Independent Assessment Service themselves to myself, that the agent at the time was reading from internal communication, which I should not of been made privy too – and were for their own and he DWP’s records? But that this was without the knowledge, that my Benefits Support Worker in the meantime had also spoken to the Health Professional separately after they’d spoken to the Psychiatric Nurse, and the Health Professional felt she was able to complete a paper-based assessment based on the answers provided by the Benefits Support Worker and this afternoon had completed and sent off the report to the DWP.
Yadnad said: Mine was slightly different. I had claimed, quite rightly so and with medical opinion to back it up, that I could not walk reliably more than 15 metres.It was then put to me 'but what if you were in a building that was on fire and the nearest exit was 60 metres away?' Obviously my answer was that one way or another I would get to that exit.Assessed as able to walk more than 200 metres!
Earlysound said: Yadnad said: Mine was slightly different. I had claimed, quite rightly so and with medical opinion to back it up, that I could not walk reliably more than 15 metres.It was then put to me 'but what if you were in a building that was on fire and the nearest exit was 60 metres away?' Obviously my answer was that one way or another I would get to that exit.Assessed as able to walk more than 200 metres! I hope you appealed, and considered a mandatory reconsideration.
Yadnad said: Earlysound said: Yadnad said: Mine was slightly different. I had claimed, quite rightly so and with medical opinion to back it up, that I could not walk reliably more than 15 metres.It was then put to me 'but what if you were in a building that was on fire and the nearest exit was 60 metres away?' Obviously my answer was that one way or another I would get to that exit.Assessed as able to walk more than 200 metres! I hope you appealed, and considered a mandatory reconsideration. Yes the MR came back early last year with the same decision - no points.I have now appointed a professional welfare officer to put a late appeal in.
cristobal said: If assessors are asking "what would happen if it were a life or death situation" then I have to say that it's very poor interview technique. If you ask questions about hypothetical situations then all you will ever get are hypothetical answers.I'm curious to know how any answer would meet the reliabilty criteria (i.e. repeatable) unless someone regularly escapes from a burning building!
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering