We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
cherry83 said: Can I question why my aids and adaptations were accepted in my first award? But completely ignored in my review? The OT gave me the aids and the council made some adaptations to my house that was around 2 years ago but of course nothing would be recent there as they don’t keep giving you new stuff every year do they? It not a case of my condition has improved because my conditions are degenerative except fibromyalgia. I just can’t see how they can give me zero points when I had a standard daily living award with much less medical evidence. My tablets have helped me but they’ve got their own big side affects which again impact on me being able to do the things on the descriptors.
twonker said: cherry83 said: Can I question why my aids and adaptations were accepted in my first award? But completely ignored in my review? The OT gave me the aids and the council made some adaptations to my house that was around 2 years ago but of course nothing would be recent there as they don’t keep giving you new stuff every year do they? It not a case of my condition has improved because my conditions are degenerative except fibromyalgia. I just can’t see how they can give me zero points when I had a standard daily living award with much less medical evidence. My tablets have helped me but they’ve got their own big side affects which again impact on me being able to do the things on the descriptors. One of the reasons as to why aids may not be counted is if the assessor is of the opinion that you have them as a choice and not as a need.
ilovecats said: twonker said: If that is the case then you should submit written evidence from the OT who actually assessed you and determined that the aids were required. Good advice. Unfortunately will the prevalent availability of cheap aids, anyone can buy anything and say an occupational therapist said they needed it. It is harder for people with fluctuating or invisible illnesses to prove things like aid requirement so OT reports are worth their weight in gold.
twonker said: If that is the case then you should submit written evidence from the OT who actually assessed you and determined that the aids were required.
ilovecats said: cherry83 said: ilovecats said: twonker said: If that is the case then you should submit written evidence from the OT who actually assessed you and determined that the aids were required. Good advice. Unfortunately will the prevalent availability of cheap aids, anyone can buy anything and say an occupational therapist said they needed it. It is harder for people with fluctuating or invisible illnesses to prove things like aid requirement so OT reports are worth their weight in gold. Yes I have they had it the first time I got awarded then I submitted it again at review. Some aids were self purchased because although the OT recommended them they wouldn’t provide them for me. Like my cutlery and tipper kettle but all the other stuff the council fitted and provided. I understand some people fraud the system. I just don’t understand why my aids were accepted at my first claim then completely ignored at my review? Doesn’t make sense really. Perhaps the original assessor over scored you? It's not unheard of.Guidance changes over the years and in the last 18 months has got a lot stricter so perhaps the new assessor felt you demonstrated adequate capability to manage without.Either way, if you disagree, focus on proving good evidence as to why you cannot do these things and submitting a well written MR. You never know what will happen.
cherry83 said: ilovecats said: twonker said: If that is the case then you should submit written evidence from the OT who actually assessed you and determined that the aids were required. Good advice. Unfortunately will the prevalent availability of cheap aids, anyone can buy anything and say an occupational therapist said they needed it. It is harder for people with fluctuating or invisible illnesses to prove things like aid requirement so OT reports are worth their weight in gold. Yes I have they had it the first time I got awarded then I submitted it again at review. Some aids were self purchased because although the OT recommended them they wouldn’t provide them for me. Like my cutlery and tipper kettle but all the other stuff the council fitted and provided. I understand some people fraud the system. I just don’t understand why my aids were accepted at my first claim then completely ignored at my review? Doesn’t make sense really.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering