We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
Nickinors said: Hi I have photosensitive epilepsy. Ive had my PIP assessment I know that the DWP didnt approach my GP or former epilepsy specialist for medical history. I no longer attend clinic and I am on medication for my epilepsy, which is mostly controlled, so I have no current evidence to provide. I wrote a letter to my GP, requesting information that I have the condition, but they sent it back saying that the DWP would approach themselves if they required it. They didnt. There is no consistency with my seizures, they dont happen often, but they can happen anytime, without warning but the real problem which is being overlooked by the DWP is the photosensitivity. The photosensitivity is the trigger for the epilepsy which means, no driving, no computers, video games, discos, concerts, shift work, etc. I have to avoid situations that could put me in danger.The PIP form is not suitable for non visable disabilities, and because I do not fall into their yes/no tick box, they have basically disregarded my condition and how it affects me and my daily life.I am now waiting on a date to go to tribunal and I need all the help I can get. How can I prove that my condition is a disability, and make them see that the PIP form is not diverse enough?
My daughter has epilepsy and is ‘fortunate’ - if that is the correct word - that it is controlled by medication so it has a minimal impact on her day to day living.
As @twanker says it seems that the things that your epilepsy prevents you from doing aren’t those that are covered within the PIP descriptors - washing, dressing, cooking, going to the toilet etc.
I’d advise looking at the descriptors closely to see which apply…search online for DWP + PIP + descriptors…
Good luck!
ilovecats said: : If someone can evidence that they have seizures that do not have a useful warning, despite taking medication, that put their safety in danger, then they should score 1C, 4C and 11F
:
ilovecats said: twonker said: ilovecats said: I don't drive because I can't, not because I don't want to. There is a difference. Photosensitivity is the condition that causes the triggers that result in epileptic seizures. I would love to drive, but I would he risking my life and that of others by doing so.i dont think that wise or clever. I would be a liability on the roads and I for one will not take part in something that I cannot control If someone can evidence that they have seizures that do not have a useful warning, despite taking medication, that put their safety in danger, then they should score 1C, 4C and 11F Based on that principle of not having any warning that would put their safety in danger they should be awarded those descriptors.Off the subject, so presumably any of our armed forces when put in harms way and not having any warning of being attacked would certainly put them in danger. Should not all of those be offered benefits for that reason?Just asking! I don’t set the criteria, I just followed it. There is is an element of variability so if someone says they are driving because they’ve been seizure free for x amount of years then they won’t score
twonker said: ilovecats said: I don't drive because I can't, not because I don't want to. There is a difference. Photosensitivity is the condition that causes the triggers that result in epileptic seizures. I would love to drive, but I would he risking my life and that of others by doing so.i dont think that wise or clever. I would be a liability on the roads and I for one will not take part in something that I cannot control If someone can evidence that they have seizures that do not have a useful warning, despite taking medication, that put their safety in danger, then they should score 1C, 4C and 11F Based on that principle of not having any warning that would put their safety in danger they should be awarded those descriptors.Off the subject, so presumably any of our armed forces when put in harms way and not having any warning of being attacked would certainly put them in danger. Should not all of those be offered benefits for that reason?Just asking!
ilovecats said: I don't drive because I can't, not because I don't want to. There is a difference. Photosensitivity is the condition that causes the triggers that result in epileptic seizures. I would love to drive, but I would he risking my life and that of others by doing so.i dont think that wise or clever. I would be a liability on the roads and I for one will not take part in something that I cannot control If someone can evidence that they have seizures that do not have a useful warning, despite taking medication, that put their safety in danger, then they should score 1C, 4C and 11F
I don't drive because I can't, not because I don't want to. There is a difference. Photosensitivity is the condition that causes the triggers that result in epileptic seizures. I would love to drive, but I would he risking my life and that of others by doing so.i dont think that wise or clever. I would be a liability on the roads and I for one will not take part in something that I cannot control
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering