About to appeal on removal of PIP advice welcome

hackport
hackport Online Community Member Posts: 11 Listener
1. At assessment HP didn’t record details of health condition that she was told, MR therefore excludes issues as not detailed st face to face.
2. HP also marked the ‘refused examination ‘
( which I did not) and then records huge page of movements that I didn’t do
3. I am female and four times her report refers to he, I think she got notes mixed up?
4. I was awarded PIP for two years but removed at one year cos of face to face report.
5. MR report says not being able to use public transport not relevant in ability to plan and execute journey?
6. Told HP about anxiety and drug therapy, diazepam but she has recorded drug prescribed for accelerated heart rate following surgery!!! 
Any helpful advice really welcome , I am really 
Confused, the MR submission was sooo detailed but they won’t take account as Face 2 face didn’t mention!
Help☹️☹️

Comments

  • poppy123456
    poppy123456 Online Community Member Posts: 64,463 Championing
    Hi,

    I'm not surprised that the MR decision remained the same because most do.

    You need to concentrate on what descriptors apply to you and your reasons why and not the lies.  The Tribunal won't be interested in any lies that may have been told in the report.

    I'd advise you to get some face to face advice from an agency near you.