We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
ilovecats said: twonker said: And the next post I read just typifies exactly what I have said on the other thread.If Tara had refused to accept all incoming calls (better still, do not pass on telephone numbers) the confusion/lies would have never happened.Everything in writing is the only way forward so as to avoid these he said/she said arguments.Ilovecats in her last post said that assessors do record everything honestly and correctly. Lies don't seem to exist where assessors are involved. I think your misquoting me and dare I say lying yourself. Where did I say that ‘assessors record everything honestly and accurately’. If you could post the quote where I said that then that would be great. Because I would not say that because even I know it is not the case. You really do manipulate things to fit your negativity.
twonker said: And the next post I read just typifies exactly what I have said on the other thread.If Tara had refused to accept all incoming calls (better still, do not pass on telephone numbers) the confusion/lies would have never happened.Everything in writing is the only way forward so as to avoid these he said/she said arguments.Ilovecats in her last post said that assessors do record everything honestly and correctly. Lies don't seem to exist where assessors are involved.
ilovecats said: twonker said: ilovecats said: twonker said: And the next post I read just typifies exactly what I have said on the other thread.If Tara had refused to accept all incoming calls (better still, do not pass on telephone numbers) the confusion/lies would have never happened.Everything in writing is the only way forward so as to avoid these he said/she said arguments.Ilovecats in her last post said that assessors do record everything honestly and correctly. Lies don't seem to exist where assessors are involved. I think your misquoting me and dare I say lying yourself. Where did I say that ‘assessors record everything honestly and accurately’. If you could post the quote where I said that then that would be great. Because I would not say that because even I know it is not the case. You really do manipulate things to fit your negativity. I agree that you did not say that and you also agree that it would not be the case in any event. So if you disagree with what I have said - ‘assessors record everything honestly and accurately’ then that leaves only one option left - that you admit to recording everything (which I disagree with anyhow and so do many other claimants) but you record everything dishonestly and inaccurately?Even admitting that one assessor does this is one too many. What is being done to rectify this?Why should claimants have to put up with this attitude? Should these assessors be reported to their professional body? What would happen and would the assessor readily admit to carrying out this action?One bad apple in the barrel tends to lead to all of other apples going rotten would you not agree? Do you agree that claimants are justified in not trusting assessors? So you agree that you lied and misquoted me. Thanks for that.
twonker said: ilovecats said: twonker said: And the next post I read just typifies exactly what I have said on the other thread.If Tara had refused to accept all incoming calls (better still, do not pass on telephone numbers) the confusion/lies would have never happened.Everything in writing is the only way forward so as to avoid these he said/she said arguments.Ilovecats in her last post said that assessors do record everything honestly and correctly. Lies don't seem to exist where assessors are involved. I think your misquoting me and dare I say lying yourself. Where did I say that ‘assessors record everything honestly and accurately’. If you could post the quote where I said that then that would be great. Because I would not say that because even I know it is not the case. You really do manipulate things to fit your negativity. I agree that you did not say that and you also agree that it would not be the case in any event. So if you disagree with what I have said - ‘assessors record everything honestly and accurately’ then that leaves only one option left - that you admit to recording everything (which I disagree with anyhow and so do many other claimants) but you record everything dishonestly and inaccurately?Even admitting that one assessor does this is one too many. What is being done to rectify this?Why should claimants have to put up with this attitude? Should these assessors be reported to their professional body? What would happen and would the assessor readily admit to carrying out this action?One bad apple in the barrel tends to lead to all of other apples going rotten would you not agree? Do you agree that claimants are justified in not trusting assessors?
cristobal said: twonker said:One bad apple in the barrel tends to lead to all of other apples going rotten would you not agree? Do you agree that claimants are justified in not trusting assessors?@Yadnad /twonkerThe assessor I had for PIP was late, wasn't a good interviewer - but this doesn't mean that they all are.The Birmingham 6 were stitched up by the police - but it doesn't mean that all police are bent.Some MPs fiddle their expenses - but most don't.Some civil servants are lazy and incompetent - but most aren't.Some postmen/women steal the mail - mine doesn't, and he's really nice Do you really not trust the police, your MP, any civil servant, your postman/woman?I genuinely feel sorry that you've had such a bad experience that you now don't trust anyone but your constant stream of negative posts doesn't help anyone looking for advice.
cristobal said: @twonker / @yadnad - as I mentioned in my earlier post I'm really sorry to hear that ....
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering