We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
ilovecats said: While I understand it seems stupid, and believe me as an assessor I know that cooking involves more than just peeling veg and standing at a hob, this is guidance they have to follow.This is literally word for word from the official guidance:‘This activity considers a claimant’s ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one from fresh ingredients. It assesses ability to open packaging, peel and chop, serve food on to a plate and use a microwave oven or cooker hob to cook or heat food. Serving food means transferring food to a plate or bowl, it does not include presentation.Carrying items around the kitchen or carrying food to where it will be eaten is not included in this activity.This activity considers the claimants functional limitations in their ability to prepare food and not the claimant’s lack of skill or opportunity to learn. If an individual cannot cook at all because they have never needed to learn, consider their ability to carry out activities at or above waist height and their cognitive ability to use a stove or microwave if shown how.Cooking food at waist height does not consider the ability to bend down to access an oven.’Assuming your physical difficulties are lower limb only without any severe pain condition or mental/cognitive issue then it’s is likely that B would be the most appropriate descriptor.
This is literally word for word from the official guidance:
‘This activity considers a claimant’s ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one from fresh ingredients. It assesses ability to open packaging, peel and chop, serve food on to a plate and use a microwave oven or cooker hob to cook or heat food. Serving food means transferring food to a plate or bowl, it does not include presentation.
Carrying items around the kitchen or carrying food to where it will be eaten is not included in this activity.
This activity considers the claimants functional limitations in their ability to prepare food and not the claimant’s lack of skill or opportunity to learn. If an individual cannot cook at all because they have never needed to learn, consider their ability to carry out activities at or above waist height and their cognitive ability to use a stove or microwave if shown how.
Cooking food at waist height does not consider the ability to bend down to access an oven.’
Assuming your physical difficulties are lower limb only without any severe pain condition or mental/cognitive issue then it’s is likely that B would be the most appropriate descriptor.
ilovecats said: riget said: ilovecats said: While I understand it seems stupid, and believe me as an assessor I know that cooking involves more than just peeling veg and standing at a hob, this is guidance they have to follow.This is literally word for word from the official guidance:‘This activity considers a claimant’s ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one from fresh ingredients. It assesses ability to open packaging, peel and chop, serve food on to a plate and use a microwave oven or cooker hob to cook or heat food. Serving food means transferring food to a plate or bowl, it does not include presentation.Carrying items around the kitchen or carrying food to where it will be eaten is not included in this activity.This activity considers the claimants functional limitations in their ability to prepare food and not the claimant’s lack of skill or opportunity to learn. If an individual cannot cook at all because they have never needed to learn, consider their ability to carry out activities at or above waist height and their cognitive ability to use a stove or microwave if shown how.Cooking food at waist height does not consider the ability to bend down to access an oven.’Assuming your physical difficulties are lower limb only without any severe pain condition or mental/cognitive issue then it’s is likely that B would be the most appropriate descriptor. But they have a choice, and then decide to mark people down knowing the activity has nothing to do with cooking. They have a choice to pick a descriptor that accurately reflects the claimants ability in comparison with the set DWP standards. It does have everything to do with cooking, chopping peeling, stirring, mixing and plating etc while using a hob or microwave.
riget said: ilovecats said: While I understand it seems stupid, and believe me as an assessor I know that cooking involves more than just peeling veg and standing at a hob, this is guidance they have to follow.This is literally word for word from the official guidance:‘This activity considers a claimant’s ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one from fresh ingredients. It assesses ability to open packaging, peel and chop, serve food on to a plate and use a microwave oven or cooker hob to cook or heat food. Serving food means transferring food to a plate or bowl, it does not include presentation.Carrying items around the kitchen or carrying food to where it will be eaten is not included in this activity.This activity considers the claimants functional limitations in their ability to prepare food and not the claimant’s lack of skill or opportunity to learn. If an individual cannot cook at all because they have never needed to learn, consider their ability to carry out activities at or above waist height and their cognitive ability to use a stove or microwave if shown how.Cooking food at waist height does not consider the ability to bend down to access an oven.’Assuming your physical difficulties are lower limb only without any severe pain condition or mental/cognitive issue then it’s is likely that B would be the most appropriate descriptor. But they have a choice, and then decide to mark people down knowing the activity has nothing to do with cooking.
This activity considers a claimant’s ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one from fresh ingredients. It assesses ability to open packaging, peel and chop, serve food on to a plate and use a microwave oven or cooker hob to cook or heat food. Serving food means transferring food to a plate or bowl, it does not include presentation.
You would most likely score 2 points for needing an aid.
Adrian_Scope said: Hi @riget. I think we can all agree that it's a poorly worded descriptor that doesn't take into account the actual steps of cooking or preparing a meal. But unfortunately Poppy and ILoveCats' description of the descriptor is correct and what they've explained is all that will (rightly or wrongly) be taken into account by the assessor.Best of luck with your F2F. Please let us know how you get on. (If you need any help with any other descriptors in the meantime, just shout! )
Username_removed said: Carrying is explicitly not included because it is an interim activity and not an activity in itself. You carry from one place to another for a purpose. Your ability to perform the purpose is a more valuable measure of functional ability than anything interim. Someone with no fingers may be able to carry a bag of sugar, shopping etc. just as effectively as a person with fingers. It literally tells you nothing about functional disability. On the other hand being able to read a use by date on the sugar; being able to pour out an exact amount; being able to stir the sugar...they all give information about functional disability. The person with no fingers would be penalised if the measure was carrying as opposed to fine motor skills.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering