We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
Username_removed said: Interesting reading slightly more detail here. https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/people/judgment-reserved-court-challenge-over-definition-terminal-illness-2889916Not sure whether the UC element is part of the JR but the cancer analogy looks weak to me. Few people with cancer get an accurate prognosis. As per my example above many people live much longer than their prognosis and many people much less. It’s certainly the case that a number of people get PIP DL under the special rules but then live longer than 6 months. My point being that the prognosis for cancers is not necessarily any more accurate than it is for MND or indeed many other similar conditions. It has an arguably similar “unpredictable trajectory” as they put it.Nowhere in the argument does it address the thorny issue of the fact that most people with life-limiting conditions who struggle to go the DS1500 route do so not because of their condition but because the professionals who could certify them decline to do so for a wide variety of reasons. The process certainly needs revisiting and has been widely raised by a number of organisations in the last couple of years. Reform producing genuine improvements is rarely easy. The inference that cancer patients largely have it easier seems a little misguided to me. Both conditions are horrible but I’m not sure this is the case to pin reform on.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering