Hello I have a couple of questions, one is about DLA and one is about challenging overpayment decisions. DLA is the most important one but I need to give some background into the other for it to make sense.
My son is 3 nearly 4 and is registered blind. I gave up work to care for him and moved from tax credits claim to universal credit, my husband is a self employed electrician but we still qualified for some extra help.
When I signed up for uc we got an extra disabled child element for my son being registered blind and my work coach asked if I care for him 35 hours a week. I said I did and then I started getting a carer element too.
A few month ago I had a message on my journal saying I had been overpaid and wasn’t entitled to disabled child element. I explained I was because my son being blind and they sent it to a decision maker who agreed with me. I then got another letter saying I had been overpaid carer element and wasn’t entitled to it because I my son didn’t get DLA. I didn’t know there was a separate benefit he may be entitled to - so that’s what prompted my to apply for DLA.
We got our decision letter yesterday and he has been rejected for DLA and says he has no additional care needs of a child his age and no mobility needs.
My questions are:
Is this correct? Is he only entitled to the disabled child element of uc and not DLA?
The carer element they gave me incorrectly, should I be having to pay this back? It was their fault not mine.
Is there any way other than getting DLA and then carer element for them to not pressure me back to work? I’m not ready to leave him yet but uc are saying I have to work 16 hours because he is 3 and they don’t accept I am a carer