Complaint to IAS upheld
IAS contacted me to say my complaint had been reviewed by a CMRA senior clinician, who concluded there were quality issues with both daily living and mobility sections.
The DWP has now said they are looking at my claim again and will reach a decision within 10 weeks.
It is my first time applying for PIP so I am not very well versed with how it all works.
I have lost sleep over this and been extremely stressed since the beginning of this process, so any advice would be much appreciated.
Comments
-
@Username_removed Thank you for your feedback.I am just worried that the DWP will disregard the amended IAS report and stick with the original assessment instead - hence forcing me to go via MR/tribunal route, to buy themselves time & discourage me from pursuing further.Am hoping someone has been in a similar situation as myself and had a successful outcome,0
-
Of course DWP have a vested interest, they are the ones making the payments.
I don’t appreciate my comments dismissed as “just nonsense” when they are perfectly justified. I witnessed my cousin battle DWP for 18 months despite severe debilitating disease requiring a wheelchair and crutches (they even used CCTV recordings to try to catch her out, and failed).
I have heard of many cases where severely ill claimants are rejected & forced to jump through hoops causing stress & anxiety, via long winded MR and tribunal route, only to end up with the award they were entitled to in the first place.
So forgive me for being sceptical about DWP’s actions towards disabled people. And judging by the high percentage of claims they reject every year leading to MR/appeals I highly doubt they give a hoot about stats against them re: quality of their decision making.
0 -
I stand by my statement that DWP have created an extremely complicated system purely to deny as many claimants as possible.
They pay ATOS to carry out assessments in which they lie/misquote claimants or withhold important evidence, leading to unnecessary stress and anxiety.There are plenty of examples not only on this forum but in media where assessment reports have turned out to be works of pure fabrication.The govt does not look favourably on high number of ppl on benefits hence the continued efforts by DWP to sanction claimants & refuse awards.
I won’t debate this further so we’ll have to agree to disagree0
Categories
- All Categories
- 13.6K Start here and say hello!
- 6.7K Coffee lounge
- 50 Games den
- 1.6K People power
- 32 Community noticeboard
- 20.9K Talk about life
- 4.8K Everyday life
- 2.2K Families and carers
- 795 Education and skills
- 1.7K Work
- 383 Money and bills
- 3.2K Housing and independent living
- 806 Transport and travel
- 626 Relationships
- 1.2K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.2K Talk about your impairment
- 835 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 885 Neurological impairments and pain
- 1.8K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.1K Autism and neurodiversity
- 33.5K Talk about your benefits
- 5.4K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 17.8K PIP, DLA, and AA
- 5.6K Universal Credit (UC)
- 4.7K Benefits and income