If we become concerned about you or anyone else while using one of our services, we will act in line with our safeguarding policy and procedures. This may involve sharing this information with relevant authorities to ensure we comply with our policies and legal obligations.
Find out how to let us know if you're concerned about another member's safety.
Find out how to let us know if you're concerned about another member's safety.
Changes to Access to work- Civil Servants?
Options
Boyyanno92
Community member Posts: 1 Listener
I'm hoping someone on here might be able to help me. I work in the civil service and have been told that the Access to Work support will no longer be available for us and will be replaced by an "occupational health" framework. I wondered if anyone knew how this will affect employees who would normally use Access to work as it seems to be a reactive clinical stance. I don't know how employees with Disabilities will be supported under the new guidelines. Does anyone know anything more?
Comments
-
Hi and welcome to the community
I'm not sure if this is an initiative from your employer rather than access to work
I presume the oh service will be used instead to provide what access to work did
Think you need to find the answers from your employer as nobody here will know any details
Access to work is the employee that applies not the employer so I'm confused as to how this would work and taking away use of their service would stop the funding access to work provide towards any adjustments required -
My sister had a bad experience. This has been in place at DWP for a long time. They wanted the service to be better than access to work but apparently cuts eroded the service. They refused some things that atw would have funded, because of cost. What happens is you are assessed independently and then a report is sent to your manager for them to order the equipment or arrange training etc. My sister is suing them. I feel bad for civil servants. Reading the info on that link it's pretty much the same. Hopefully it's an opportunity for the whole thing to be improved. I doubt it though. Refusing adjustments that have been recommended by a specialist independent assessor because they don't want to spend the money... what a silly idea putting managers who are meant to save the department money in charge of necessary spending in an area that should not be subject to cost cutting.
Brightness
Categories
- All Categories
- 13.1K Start here and say hello!
- 6.7K Coffee lounge
- 69 Games lounge
- 387 Cost of living
- 4.3K Disability rights and campaigning
- 1.9K Research and opportunities
- 200 Community updates
- 9.3K Talk about your situation
- 2.1K Children, parents, and families
- 1.6K Work and employment
- 773 Education
- 1.7K Housing and independent living
- 1.4K Aids, adaptations, and equipment
- 590 Dating, sex, and relationships
- 363 Exercise and accessible facilities
- 739 Transport and travel
- 31.9K Talk about money
- 4.4K Benefits and financial support
- 5.2K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 17.2K PIP, DLA, and AA
- 5K Universal Credit (UC)
- 6.2K Talk about your impairment
- 1.8K Cerebral palsy
- 872 Chronic pain and pain management
- 181 Physical and neurological impairments
- 1.1K Autism and neurodiversity
- 1.2K Mental health and wellbeing
- 317 Sensory impairments
- 820 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
Complete our feedback form and tell us how we can make the community better.