We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
woodbine said: Hi I suppose the first question is how old are you? I think most councils age restrictions are pretty much set in stone, usually for good reason, sorry thats not what you want to hear. I am 30 years old, yes it seems there is no wiggle room with this rule for council properties. However it does seem a bit more flexible with private rented.The frustrating thing is why can't someone my age be eligible for a property like that? Why is it so strictly over 55s only?I'm assuming the rule is in place as they are looking for tenants that fit a certain ctiteria and maybe have a certain lifestyle (like when other properties are over 30/40s only or don't accept benefits/no pets/no children etc). They are obviously looking for a certain type of tenant, someone who is financillay stable or has a secure job, who won't cause damage to the property by having kids or pets.I know that I don't meet the age criteria for those age restricted properties of course but I feel like I would meet their requirements in every other aspect.I may only be 30 but I literally have the lifestyle of a 60yr old woman, and I have the same mobility issues as someone that age.It seems there are simply no brackets that support disabled people who are under the age of 55, and that really confuses me 🤔
woodbine said: Hi I suppose the first question is how old are you? I think most councils age restrictions are pretty much set in stone, usually for good reason, sorry thats not what you want to hear.
poppy123456 said: Privately rented properties are completely different to socially renting. If you claim for help with the rent from benefits then you'll be very lucky to find any landlord that will accept you as a tenant, even if you didn't have a dog. Age restrictions don't exist as such with privately rented either.
janer1967 said: Hi there Just to add my experience I live in social housing bungalow and moved in when I was 50 due to medical reasons I was assessed by ot who reported I needed a bungalow or ground floor flat My council has an over 55 policy for most bungalow but this is waived if for medical reasons My neighbour also in bungalow is about 25 and no disabilities god knows how they are eligible buf I don't make the rules
janer1967 said: Hi again Yes it was occupational therapist I was referred by hospital when I lost my leg . However you can self refer . It's called a care needs assessment and you refer from the gov website A ot will then come out and assess your needs and make a report of recommendations. If you need a certain type of property you can use the report to send to housing and then they should change your banding accordingly so you can bid on suitable properties It did take over a year to find something luckily there were some new build bungalows in the area that had just been made available to social housing I know I was lucky
Teddybear12 said: Hi @GinaGee123 Some of the over 55 bungalows have shared gardens how would this work for you? Are there any over 55 bungalows in your area for social housing ? Could the council not allow you to have secure fencing round the garden you have. Because you already have a ground floor flat you will not be priority with the council. Did you have your dog when you were first allocated your flat? Sorry so many questions. Contacting an Advocacy Service in your area might help you to see where you stand an initial chat cannot do any harm. Take care.
janer1967 said: Unfortunately I would imagine the councils only consideration would be that you are in suitable housing and not take into account your assistance dog I'm not saying this is right but can imagine that is their stance Have you got any advice from cab or any where else I'm not familiar with advocacy but think they deal more with clients unable to communicate for themselves Try cab if not done so already
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering