We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.
MrBrightside said: Hello, just a thought (I'm new!), mainly for admins. / volunteers....Does the DWP get criticised or rebuked for their performance? The application process is a disgrace, especially for vulnerable people (I'm not, I just have 2 chronic health conditions). Waiting up to an hour on the phone to speak to someone. Waiting 6/12 months for decisions. MR's that don't change. Etc., etc. I just read a post where an applicant was treated horribly, had to go all the way to tribunal, and then received 2 x enhanced! The fact they had to go through all that, for that length of time, is outrageous. Does the sitting tribunal criticise the DWP on their performance as part of their review of that case? Are all benefit applications as challenging as PIP? Are advocacy agencies like CAB, Scope, etc. campaigning against the DWP on our behalf? I fully understand why an applicant might give up at MR or before. The whole thing is not right.
Biblioklept said: AndrewHall said: To answer your main question. When I received a benefit claim form too complicated to complete, I just signed and date and sent it back to DWP saying I am too ill to complete the rest. I can then explain myself better at the assessment. I don't have much luck with DWP because I normally get awarded at the Tribunal. For me, DWP is irrelevance and inconvenience. Which forms do you find too complicated? Not filling in the forms at all might be why you're having to go to tribunal
AndrewHall said: To answer your main question. When I received a benefit claim form too complicated to complete, I just signed and date and sent it back to DWP saying I am too ill to complete the rest. I can then explain myself better at the assessment. I don't have much luck with DWP because I normally get awarded at the Tribunal. For me, DWP is irrelevance and inconvenience.
The value must be greater than or equal to 1.
Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering