What is your opinion on benefit sanctions?
Bamboo
Online Community Member Posts: 20 Connected
I'm really interested to know what people think about them.
I disagree with them and don't think there is anything that could be said that would change my mind but I am open to hearing opinions.
Is there a place for benefit sanctions? In what situations do you think they should be used?
I disagree with them and don't think there is anything that could be said that would change my mind but I am open to hearing opinions.
Is there a place for benefit sanctions? In what situations do you think they should be used?
0
Comments
-
Hi there
I think if they are imposed fairly and reasonably then they do have a place but before being sanctioned claimants should be informed and given a chance to give reasons why they have not completed their commitments
Some sanctions are just unreasonable but what would stop claimants just getting their benefit and not attending job centre appt or not looking for work if there was no consequence0 -
My views are as above.0
-
Thanks everyone for sharing your views. I think it could be a really insightful thread0
-
Hi if you dont communicate with DWP and fail to turn up for appointments then you probably deserve to get sanctioned.1
-
Signon said:Hi if you dont communicate with DWP and fail to turn up for appointments then you probably deserve to get sanctioned.
There are many reasons people don't or can't communicate with the DWP. And sanctions are regularly abused and misused.2 -
From 2018
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/benefit-sanctions-are-harmful-and-ineffective/
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/955/955.pdf
"At best, evidence on the effectiveness of sanctions is mixed, and at worst, it shows them to be counterproductive. The Coalition Government had little or no understanding of the likely impact of a tougher sanctions regime when it was introduced in 2012. It said the policy would be reviewed on an ongoing basis to understand its impact and the extent to which it was achieving its objectives. But six years later, it is none the wiser. The lack of any such evaluation is unacceptable....the policy appears to be nothing other than arbitrarily punitive." page 61.
Little has changed since 2018.4 -
Signon said:Hi if you dont communicate with DWP and fail to turn up for appointments then you probably deserve to get sanctioned.
That's rather harsh in my opinion. Some people are unable to use the phone or go out to be able to attend any appointments. How is a sanction fair in these circumstances?
0 -
Thinking back to 2015, the DWP removed fake posters which shown people happy they had received a sanction as it made them work harder to look for a job!
https://web.archive.org/web/20160107141650/http://dial2donate.org/dwp-uses-fake-claimants-in-benefit-sanctions-leaflet/
I personally agree with others that it really isn’t right to sanction. The two child limit and cap, yes. Sanctions, no.0 -
with the 2 child limit I'm wondering if you agree with it blanketly?
I also agree with the current exceptions to this rule.0 -
i'm not a fan of the sanctions, they don't seem to take into account a clients problems, never been sanctioned myself though0
-
It depends on the reasons behind the sanction, if someone who is a jobseeker is not actively looking for work, or deliberately doesn't attend appointments then sanctions are justified (they should get a couple of warnings before sanctioning). I don't agree with sanctions against people with disabilities, although I don't know how often that happens. If people have difficulties that cause potential issues like not being contactible or intellectual vulnerabilities etc then they should be supported by the DWP.0
-
I agree that people with disabilities or vulnerable should not be sanctioned.
Claimants who dont have disabilities run the risk of being sanctioned once they agree to their job commitments1 -
I feel as though anyone not keeping to their commitments has a reason. Some may be disability, some may be social or economical or lots of other barriers. I feel those that are able to keep to their commitments would do so regardless of threat of sanction. Those who can't, the sanction clearly doesn't work as a deterrant so it's just needlessly cruel and further penalising people who are already having to survive on very little.
The standard monthly allowance that a person is expected to live on is less than I pay for my energy bill each month.1 -
In my opinion claimants in the vulnerable groups ,with disabilities and mental health issues should be exempt from being sanctioned by DWP1
-
would like to hear others views on benefit punitive sanctions and commitments0
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.3K Start here and say hello!
- 6.9K Coffee lounge
- 72 Games den
- 1.6K People power
- 106 Community noticeboard
- 22.2K Talk about life
- 5.1K Everyday life
- 70 Current affairs
- 2.3K Families and carers
- 829 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 447 Money and bills
- 3.4K Housing and independent living
- 906 Transport and travel
- 661 Relationships
- 65 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.3K Talk about your impairment
- 846 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 894 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 36K Talk about your benefits
- 5.6K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 18.6K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 6.7K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.1K Benefits and income