nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

We want to hear from you: please tell us about your experience of the online community.

7/10 PIP APPEALS WON BY SAME EVIDENCE

ChiChi

https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2022/october/7-10-pip-appeals-won-same-evidence-dwp-already-held

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Cartini

What point are you trying to make? Just posting a link doesn`t have any context; you need to say why you are posting it.

calcotti

Cartini said:

What point are you trying to make? Just posting a link doesn`t have any context; you need to say why you are posting it.

I think one conclusion one might draw is that claimants should worry less about trying to obtaining extra information when appealing and focus more on making clear that their arguments for being entitled to PIP have been made clearly - which is exactly what is often advised on this forum.

Cartini

calcotti said:

Cartini said:

What point are you trying to make? Just posting a link doesn`t have any context; you need to say why you are posting it.

I think one conclusion one might draw is that claimants should worry less about trying to obtaining extra information when appealing and focus more on making clear that their arguments for being entitled to PIP have been made clearly - which is exactly what is often advised on this forum.

That make sense, thank you.

Component react.suggestedcontent had an error.

The value must be greater than or equal to 1.

Sign in or register for free

Get more out of your online community by signing in or registering