The Green Paper Discussion (the document link is here too!)

1404143454689

Comments

  • Fuji
    Fuji Online Community Member Posts: 109 Empowering

    Everyone on pip and lcwra is protected under the equality act as we all have disabilities in some form or another. Labour obviously don't care anymore. If they cared about the equality act they wouldn't be doing any of this.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    I’m leaving my body to medical science in the hope it helps to save animal experiments ( no idea if it would but it’s a nice thought) so I guess I could

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    they must know it’ll go to court even if it needs to go to echr. I remember one MP recently said they’ll never go against the echr. Is this their plan to look tough on benefits for the right wing vote knowing they’ll lose in court and they’re absorbed of responsibility? Plus of course we’d get back pay

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    I think and I could be wrong that they usually need a claimant to instruct them in their behalf and then that law if used in future cases . Although it may just be tribal laws . Either way they’ll be ready over everything with activists and charities.

  • Fuji
    Fuji Online Community Member Posts: 109 Empowering

    Labour have been scared of Reform for weeks now. They are appealing to the right wing votes so they can stay in power longer. They are power hungry and don't care about anyone unless you are are rich.

    What they are doing is breaking the United Nations disability thing they signed up to. Which means the UN will probably take them to court again like they did with the tories multiple times. But that doesn't seem to do anything because uk gov just seems to ignore them and doesn't care.

  • Vulcress
    Vulcress Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    Richard sums the situation up perfectly

    Timms who I once had great respect for has done a complete 180.

    They have a tonne of other options open, but the most disgusting thing longcovid and the pandemic aftermath have been totally ignored "but we are not at levels before the pandemic"

    Yes because a virus ravaged the Globe and we had a clown of a PM who was useless.

    We have a situation in which consultants within the NHS on 500k a year +

    are now in rental housing, money all gone reliant on PIP. Yes Liz they must be so happy they have lost everything and PIP is so Generous it beats making 500k a year.

    What Richard explains here is coming right to the heart of why Labour have failed.

    Her policies are A level student project, There's a story flying around Reeves and Starmer

    if this year goes as bad as expected will be out, guess who they want as PM? Streeting.

    167 seat Maj is impressive but when you look how many of those seats are under 1,000 majority to act like this they really are clueless.

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,295 Championing

    Did you see how rude starmer was when Diane Abbott was talking

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    Hi, where did you find that PIP yest please? Do you have a link for it if possible, cheers.

  • Jimm19
    Jimm19 Online Community Member Posts: 50 Contributor

    My LCWRA award period expired in April 24 and I'm still waiting on reassessment.

  • Fuji
    Fuji Online Community Member Posts: 109 Empowering

    Doesn't surprise me. Starmer hates her. Labour have been trying to get rid of her got years

  • Andi66
    Andi66 Online Community Member Posts: 1,295 Championing

    This was on kendells Facebook page in the comments section

    Conflict of Interest: Liz Kendall’s partner, James Ind, involvement in a post-war investment venture in Ukraine worth up to $1 trillion: In regard to: Liz Kendall’s £5 billion cuts to welfare is to fund a war chest to supply the Ukraine military with weapons and Kendall's statement that she has an ambition, in her role as the DWP secretary, to recruit unemployed 16 -24 years olds into the British Army which Keir Starmer intends to deploy to Ukraine as a so called “peace keeping force” on the behalf of Ukraine.

    The Fund for the Development of Ukraine is a collaboration between JP Morgan, BlackRock, and McKinsey & Company. The Fund for the Development of Ukraine is set to attract investments that could total between $400 billion and $1 trillion. This fund isn’t just merely about rebuilding a war-torn nation; it’s a strategic play to ensure Western capital maintains control over Ukraine’s economic future.

    Banco Santander S.A.'s holdings in JPMorgan Chase were worth $81,977,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (JPMorgan Chase is the result of the combination of several large U.S. banking companies that merged since 1996, combining Chase Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan & Co., and Bank One, as well as asset assumptions of Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, and First Republic.& Co.)

    Liz Kendall’s partner/husband, whom she lives with in their £4million Notting Hill house with, is James Ind. James Ind joined Santander Asset Management in 2023 as the Global Head of Multi-Asset solutions. In 2024, he was also appointed as the Chief Investment Officer of Santander Asset Management UK and oversees the Multi-Asset Solutions UK and the Strategic Investment Solutions teams.

  • Vulcress
    Vulcress Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    It really needs to happen,

    they keep saying 1,000 claims a day, how many are getting it?

    has it occurred to them OAP's might be putting in claims now to offset the loss of the WFP

    Elderly people are a core group who are reluctant to claim things like this.

    They made a choice instead of being fair and doing what they promised they did a complete U turn and ignored the wealthy.

    Apparently Starmer was "Grumpy" today..

  • charlie72
    charlie72 Online Community Member Posts: 259 Pioneering

    At least we know theyr'e probably not secret lovers, anyways I'm sure Diane Abbot has better taste than that Psycopath.

  • calflye
    calflye Online Community Member Posts: 109 Empowering

    For what it's worth, I was reading CAB's website about their views on the Green Paper and their advisers seem to be vehemently against it. A lot of organisations, including here, in support of disabled people should hopefully be able to get our MPs to listen. I'm trying to write a letter to my local MP about it.

  • Vulcress
    Vulcress Online Community Member Posts: 111 Empowering

    Basically the Tories did the same,

    that amount stays frozen so no new uplifts, in real terms its a cut because as the cost of living increases this money doesn't. The Tories loved freezing the Benefits it saved them billions and its part of the reason the rise in foodbanks happened, they know the situation people who rely on Benefits rarely can save or have savings so that money goes straight back into the economy. VAT is a tax is brings in around 360 million a year, even Children buying a console game pay TAX, this narrative people on Benefits "pay nothing" is just total BS.

    If one more "presenter" says Mobility cars are "free" yes people get free fuel for the 3 years

    Brexit has seen this country become a deeply bitter place.

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    I think if the UN take them to court and win if will look very bad for Starmer as human rights lawyer. He may not want to be PM for longer than one term and instead aim higher. Going against the UN and ECHR isn’t a good look especially from a lawyer who believes in them . He has no interest in lowering immigration and so regardless of his treatment to the sick disabled elderly he won’t win again IMO.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 1,170 Championing
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Middleton
    Middleton Online Community Member Posts: 263 Empowering
    edited March 19

    I receive enhanced on both aspects; but should have scored at least a 6-8 on the same Q you say you would score an 8- yet I received 0 lmao…😂

    All this…despite my providing reams of unprecedented corroborating evidence from my special Nurse: Clinical Psychologist and the entire team, where I was diagnosed!

    I dont mention this not to concern you, but i just checked my award papers today for the first time in 3 yrs and was re-shocked at reading that part again lol…but like so many here, i didnt kick up a fuss as i was awarded enhanced overall.

    For my next renewal I will be raising these concerns, as i did mention in my original claim for them to contact all respective parties, as they can confirm my exact symptoms..

    It seems that PIP totally ignored this part🤔

    You should be fine, but dont take it for granted like i did; that they will see the obvious and agree👍

  • secretsquirrel1
    secretsquirrel1 Online Community Member Posts: 2,052 Championing

    you must record any future assessments. Do not rely on them recording as they say at the last minute they can’t ( happened to me) . Mine also ignored the 4? Point questions and asked me about the 2, point questions. Again that’s happened to me.

This discussion has been closed.