Green Paper Discussion (from 24th March, 2025)

1495052545559

Comments

  • sarah_lea12
    sarah_lea12 Online Community Member Posts: 113 Empowering
  • Maggie37
    Maggie37 Online Community Member Posts: 72 Empowering

    I’m staying off this thread at moment for the exact same reason. It needs brought back into focus.

  • Maggie37
    Maggie37 Online Community Member Posts: 72 Empowering

    He didn’t. Around 38.7 percent of eligible Americans voted for Trump. His approval rating has gone down further since the election and is now lower than his contemporaries at this time for sixty years. Kamala was unelectable having being ‘shuffled’ in but it was by no means a landslide. He is particularly unpopular with voters on the economy at the present time. This is not a forum/ topic about Trump and I’ve asked moderators to remind folk of that but you should revisit facts about his popularity.

  • Girl_No1
    Girl_No1 Online Community Member Posts: 205 Empowering

    I've been unusually busy today. Could anyone explain what the various charities/ organisations hope to gain by boycotting the discussions around this green paper?

    Have they concluded it is a waste of time/energy as it's already a done deal? 😕

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,658 Championing
    edited April 4

    worried, I have seen someone else mention it is seeded in an earlier change as well, but I would love a link to these two acts so I can read myself, because if it was in those acts then surely it would have led to changes been enacted earlier, so I would prefer to read these acts. But maybe I can skip that, If I am right you mean the planned removal of LCW/LCWRA in their entirety?

    Search legislation.gov.uk

    No, don't skip them! They need to be read and understood - the 2011 amended ESA regulations in conjunction with the Welfare Reform Act 2012.

    We need Greens and Lib dems to merge, for some reason they wont do it, the latest polling graph has Tories, Labour and Reform at the low 20s support, if Lib Dems and Greens merged, they would have combined 23%.

    Sadly, Ed Davey helped pass the 2015 cuts into law after the LibDem/Tory coalition government got the "reassessment regulations" through in 2010. Many other sitting MP's were serving then.

  • Tonypiano777
    Tonypiano777 Online Community Member Posts: 55 Empowering
    edited April 4

    I remember my first 10- bob note Sarah - in my 10th year birthday cards! Felt a rich boy at this time (oh, Probably way before you were born though )😀

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 4,810 Championing

    Totally understand that my neighbours we all moved in the same time same age lived beside each other 25 years she's a manager she works for dwp and was saying about changes and she said to me your such a kind caring person I could see you as a carer I felt so sad and embarrassed I never compare myself to anyone but I did then her and her husband bought thier house I can see it's her time in her life and my life is in my room with the curtains drawn I know people say it's never to late and I understand that but I just don't have the capability to do what people find normal I really understand I have autism not diagnosed but makes such sense I'm a complete loner I live in my head anyways can go on and on but yes I think it starts from birth for some people if your natured you grow if your pushed down you get broken regrets I have a few but as the song goes all we have is here and now

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 4,810 Championing

    It's easy to drift to other topics I do it all the time not intently

  • Catherine21
    Catherine21 Posts: 4,810 Championing

    That 50 pence is your pocket money 💰

  • Girl_No1
    Girl_No1 Online Community Member Posts: 205 Empowering

    Well said, @noonebelieves 🙂

  • bton1968
    bton1968 Online Community Member Posts: 16 Contributor

    beginning of the end for Starmer ?

  • WhatThe
    WhatThe Online Community Member, Scope Member Posts: 3,658 Championing
  • gamer1
    gamer1 Online Community Member Posts: 73 Empowering

    Sorry to hear you have been affected and I agree we have to unite. However I just want to say my opinion.

    If we don't do something about it then it definitely will be who deserves it and who doesn't because the 4 point descriptor will hit hard and it is designed to hit hard. It will be who is more disabled and who isn't. It will be who is more effective at the point scoring and who isn't. It will be the haves and the have nots. Millions will suffer. This is almost very close to happening. They are trying to make it happen. Those that say nothing is happening right now, nothing is for certain, well, they are going ahead with it aren't they?

    It will be who is more disabled and whose disability deserves financial help and whose doesn't. That is what the reforms are all about this is why they designed it.

  • noonebelieves
    noonebelieves Online Community Member Posts: 396 Pioneering
  • Ross1975
    Ross1975 Online Community Member Posts: 125 Empowering
    edited April 4

    I think the last thing any of us want is to be assessed by work coaches, unless you're thinking of ones that are fully qualified doctors and psychiatrists.

    A lot of work coaches have no understanding of mental issues, and there's a lot of work coaches who are unsympathetic and unempathetic.

    I have had experiences with most work coaches that I've seen where after I have tried to explain my issues to them it is as though it has just gone in one ear and out the other, they will still continue to treat me as though there is nothing wrong with me and expect me to do things I cannot do.

    For example, after explaining to one how I suffer from depression, social anxiety, and how I find it very hard to cope with a lot of regular situations that most other people can cope with, he suggested that I become a security guard! A mentally fragile person being expected to stand around somewhere in public and to tackle criminals?

  • gamer1
    gamer1 Online Community Member Posts: 73 Empowering
    edited April 4

    Obviously they would need to be trained and the culture would have to change. You can't have the culture we have currently with work coaches otherwise no one will qualify for disability. My thinking was it is better if the local work coaches in peoples own areas deal with claimants because circumstances in cities and rural areas are very different. Transport, finances, investment, jobs etc. That was my thinking. Personally I would not want to go to a work coach either, I get that. They would have to train people up to deal with disability if they are talking about reforming, that is what a reform should be shouldn't it?

  • luvpink
    luvpink Online Community Member Posts: 1,830 Championing

    @Albus_Scope

    Is it possible to divert the Trump posts here to the correct thread please.

  • gamer1
    gamer1 Online Community Member Posts: 73 Empowering
    edited April 4

    Forgot to mention the £97 to £47 for LCWRA. That is another thing no one dares talk about it.

  • Amaya_Ringo
    Amaya_Ringo Online Community Member Posts: 284 Pioneering
    edited April 4


    I don't disagree that the MSM can be biased, which is why it's good to read across the papers and compare sources. The only way you get to truth is by doing that. Believing in one person/politician uncritically is very dangerous. If you really support someone's way of doing things you should also be willing to hold them to account - otherwise you are only taking one side of the story as well.

    And you shouldn't ever just rely on social media, because social media is far MORE biased and more of an echo chamber than the MSM. This is because of algorithms, which give you more posts similar to what you were already reading and reacts to what you like reading. It does not give you a balanced view, which is why you should use as many sources as possible to verify what is true.

    I didn't vote Labour and I am angry about what they are doing. At the same time, I realise that the Tories and Reform would do more harm to disabled people if they were in power, so it worries me when people think that getting rid of Labour would solve all our problems. It won't. We have very few positive options, politically, as disabled people.

    I'm not going to comment on Trump because it's another country's politics. I also know people over there going through a very bad time/lost their job etc however.

    Apologies if that is still off topic but I feel like it's relevant in all the political frustration - remembering to check data and corroborate information across different sources no matter what the issue.

    If anything, what we should be concerned about is how little MSM coverage there is now of the benefit cuts, as if it's someone else's problem and not as important as the financial implications of Trump's tariffs. These are all economic issues.

    I do think that we should be challenging the idea of economically inactive as well. There is a difference between being not employed and not contributing to the economy. There will be further implications to cutting these payments if people are no longer to contribute to the economy by buying necessities and such. But there's nothing from the govt on that impact.