New Green Paper Discussion - now includes accessible formats and consultation event sign up links!
Comments
-
"The government wants to encourage people to find work, so if you're unable to find a job within the Unemployment insurance period, your eligibility for the benefit could end "
so they intend in giving people a time limit to find a job or else they'll stop your benefits ?
0 -
Yes thats how I interperate it.
0 -
That what tories said as well this is a plan set in stone regardless of who's is it's obvs tories said 1 year then benefit stops
1 -
Economists have long ago calculated which points will bring savings and the government excluded them from discussion. The government is determined to plunge the disabled into poverty.
0 -
del
0 -
I think if she had interviewed a cobblestone there would have been more meaning in the answers.
1 -
del
0 -
Three law firms working with disabled people but does seems hard to get them on primary legislation that's just my thoughts from reading up on it but I may be wrong and it's so positive that 3 firms are looking into it
1 -
Catherine, over the past few weeks, as everything has been unfolding, I’ve been researching instances when the DWP attempted major changes to benefits in the past. Below, I’ve listed two examples of government U-turns on benefit reforms, and you might be surprised to learn that in both cases, it was not through court action. Instead, it was the sheer strength of outcry and opposition from disability charities, public protests, and individuals lobbying MPs and ministers that made the difference.
Between 2011 and 2013, the government aimed to save £160 million annually by 2014–15 by trying to remove the mobility component of DLA from people living in state-funded care homes, claiming it was a duplication of other funding. But after huge opposition from campaigners, charities like Disability Rights UK, and widespread public concern, the plan was scrapped in 2013.
This issue never went to court, the political pressure, public protests, and media coverage were so intense that the government had to abandon the plan. Yes, the government stood firm, the row rumbled on for over two years, but in the end, they had to cave in after all the pressure.
Then in 2016, the government attempted to cut £30 per week from ESA for those in the WRAG group as part of broader welfare reforms, aiming to save £1.4 billion annually. It triggered national outrage. Charities such as Mencap and Scope led protests, petitions gained tens of thousands of signatures, and growing cross-party opposition put the government under pressure. In the end, they delayed the cut and later abandoned it altogether.
Whether it’s through petitions, protests, writing to MPs, or simply standing by each other, unity truly matters. When people come together, especially in the face of something overwhelming and unjust, everything can begin to shift. The examples above show that real change happens not through privilege or power, but because people cared enough to speak out. We’ve done it before, and with courage and solidarity, we can do it again.
7 -
Thank you again 👍for what you've said about my tips for signing petitions. @noonebelieves I'm glad you are considering joining X, it's good to get more of our message to the general public.
And also for saying how much you appreciate what I do for you and the community. That's lovely, it's really made my day.😃🤗
I'm having a good day today, I hope that yours is going well,so far. 👍
All the best to you too! 😊
0 -
They only need you to pay taxes and vote.
1 -
Intreasting I don't think starmer reeves with stand down on this ego driven for him wants the trophy Dpac got meeting 6.30pm today
0 -
Thanks so much for your interpretation - that absolutely affirms my understanding of what’s outlined in the Green Paper proposal .
Just to add:unemployment insurance is currently being consulted on - specifically in Question 4:
“4. How could we introduce a new Unemployment Insurance, how long should it last for and what support should be provided during this time to support people to adjust to changes in their life and get back into work?”
Best Wishes!
1 -
True they couldn't of made that more clearer starmer wants this so bad
1 -
Surly this is discrimination at it's finest mental health versus physical health cannot be deemed to attacked people with mental health my worry is as we are speaking they are pushing through starmer very sneaky like that
0 -
did any of us imagine labour would hate us so much ?
I never voted them , but for those who did , must be a kick in the teeth.
1 -
@Catherine21 - I completely agree!Everything the government has proposed in the Green Paper and the so-called consultation (or lack of a real one) feels “sneakily” designed to push through harmful changes. Please don’t lose hope -we have to keep pushing back together
Best Wishes 🤗
1 -
What about the over 60s? Many of us have worked and paid into the system since the middle/end of the 1970s (1977 for me, age 15 working full time). I'm now 64, just started the WCA process, yet to be assessed. What happens if I fail this and I'm forced back to job searching? I haven't even tried for PIP. I'm 64 for goodness sake, haven't I contributed enough yet? First they put the retirement age up from 60 to 65 over an 8 year period ending in 2018. For many of us, we had already worked and paid into the system approx 40 years by that point. Then they put it up again to 66 in Oct 2020 and soon to 67 in 2026. How many people like me keep having the goal posts moved (7 years added for me, cant get state pension now until 2028). If I fail my WCA I'll be forced to job search, re-train etc. It's utterly ridiculous for this age group. Not all of us earned enough to put by for a private or several pension pots and are reliant on our state pension which we've paid into. The fact the government has spent this money is not out fault. We were told work, pay your tax and NI and you'll get your state pension at 60 back in the 1970s. Look how that's turned out.
4 -
Been reading lot of stories they are being called out for it all especially not giving disabled people a say on consultation and the planned online events saying totally unfair as we are not allowed to talk about pip or esa let labour carry on no courts could say that any of this is in our best intreast income court cases human rights we have been treated like second class citizen a stain on society even if I wasn't disabled I would be apalled by it all it's really shame on them they will get egg on thier faces and I will celebrate as we all win
0 -
2
Categories
- All Categories
- 14.9K Start here and say hello!
- 7K Coffee lounge
- 80 Games den
- 1.7K People power
- 98 Announcements and information
- 23.1K Talk about life
- 5.4K Everyday life
- 250 Current affairs
- 2.3K Families and carers
- 853 Education and skills
- 1.8K Work
- 496 Money and bills
- 3.5K Housing and independent living
- 988 Transport and travel
- 681 Relationships
- 71 Sex and intimacy
- 1.4K Mental health and wellbeing
- 2.4K Talk about your impairment
- 857 Rare, invisible, and undiagnosed conditions
- 914 Neurological impairments and pain
- 2K Cerebral Palsy Network
- 1.2K Autism and neurodiversity
- 37.9K Talk about your benefits
- 5.8K Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
- 19.1K PIP, DLA, ADP and AA
- 7.5K Universal Credit (UC)
- 5.4K Benefits and income